Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1343–1358. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1343

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean efficiency scores for the four stimuli (n = 29). ST canonical faces gave rise to the most efficient performance and AT scrambled faces gave rise to the least efficient performance in the orientation judgment task. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.