Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 23;6(3):e17916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017916

Table 2. Cost efficiency analysis.

Costs (£) Hands on time (hrs) Theoretical detection limit (cells) Soil analytical sensitivity1 (cells g−1) Cost - efficiency score Faeces analytical sensitivity1 (cells g−1) Cost - efficiency score
QIAamp stool kit 4.78 5.18 4×102 1.83×106 30 8.5×108 43
Powersoil™ 4.65 5.01 4×102 8.5×108 28 8.5×108 42
Ultraclean™ 3 4.28 1×102 3.95×105 17 4.25×108 26
FastDNA® Spin Kit 4.05 4.57 2×102 8.5×104 20 1.9×107 29
Griffiths 2.78 2.51 1×102 8.5×104 14 1.9×106 17
Modified FastDNA® Spin Kit 0.1 g 4.05 4.57 1×103 4.25×105 23 4.25×106 27
Modified Griffiths 0.1 g 2.78 2.51 5×102 4.25×106 18 4.25×105 16

Lower scores indicate greater cost-effectiveness. 1Data are expressed as geometric means of either the three soil types or the two faecal types analytical sensitivities, respectively.