Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 4;108(9):147–154. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0147

eTable. Prospective and retrospective studies on port implantation in the chest wall*1.

Authors No. ports Discipline*2 Technique*3 Approach*4 Catheter days Complications Infections Venous thromboses Pneumothorax Catheter fracture Explantation*5
Ignatov et al.2009 (e19) 561 Surg. (7%) Surg. EJV (358) 675 104 (19%) 42 (7.5%) 30 (5.3%) 2 (0.36%) NA 46 (8.2%)
Rad. (3%) Seld./lm IJV (15)
SclV (179)
CephV (9)
Hsieh et al. 2009 (e20) 1348 Surg. Seld./lm SclV (196) 178 102 (7.5%) 40 (2.96%) 47 (3.48%) NA NA 102 (7.6%)
Surg. CephV (1100)
NA Other (52)
Biffi et al.2009 (16) 401 Surg. Seld./lm IJV (132) 356.5(0–1087) 60 (15%) 1 (0.8%) 15 (12.8%) 0 0 1 (0.9%)
Seld/US SclV (136) 3 (2.4%) 8 (6.5%) 0 0 1 (0.8%)
Surg. CephV (133) 3 (2.5%) 11 (9.2%) 1 (0.7%) 0 6 (5%)
Rouzrokh et al. 2009 (e21) 524 Surg. Surg. IJV 329.5(8–2028) 120 (22.9%) 29 (5.5%) 7 (1.3%) NA 0 14 (2.7%)
Vandoni et al. 2009 (e22) 228 Surg. Seld./lm SclV 441(6–3090) 56 (24.6%) 10 (4.3%) NA 10 (4.3%) 13 (5.7%) 24 (10.5%)
Samaras et al. 2008 (e24) 201 Surg. Seld./lm SclV (62) 175(1–831) 46 (22.9%) 14 (7%) 12 (6%) 4 (2%) 0 20 (10%)
Surg. CephV (139)
Araujo et al.2008 (e23) 1231 Surg. Seld./lm SclV (617) 363 (3–1132) 118 (20.8%) 19 (3.4%) 11 (2%) 6 (1%) 2 (0.4%) 43 (17.3%)
IJV (614) 244 (3–853) 48 (9.2%) 11 (2%) 3 (0.6%) 2 (0.3%) 0 16 (13.9%)
Chen et al.2007 (e25) 100 Surg. Surg. CephV/SclV 170(65–274) 9 (9%) 4 (8%) 1 (2%) 0 0 7 (14%)
An. Seld./lm IJV 1 (2%) 0 0 0 1 (2%)
Marcy et al.2005 (e26) 100 Surg. Surg. CephV 222(12–680) 16 (16%) 6 (6%) 3 (3%) 0 0 11 (11%)
Stein et al.2005 (24) 2359 Surg. Surg. CephV (2253) NA 147 (4.3%) 57 (2.4%) 49 (2%) 5 (0.2%) 0 15 (0.6%)
Seld./lm SclV (106)
Caers et al.2005 (e27) 448 Surg. Surg. CephV 366(3–1 206) 91 (20.8%) 19 (4.3%) 37 (8.5%) 3 (0.7%) 1 (0.2%) 42 (9.6%)
Vardy et al.2004 (e28) 111 Rad. Seld./lm SclV 210(60–570) 23 (20.7%) 6 (5.4%) 2 (2%) 2 (2%) NA 8 (7.2%)
Biffi et al.2004 (e29) 377 Surg. Seld./lm SclV 473(1–1419) 19 (5%) 5 (1.33%) 4 (1.1%) 7 (1.9%) 0 11 (2.9%)
Wolosker et al. 2004 (e30) 519 Surg. Surg. EJV (383) 353(5–1729) 83 (16%) 44 (8.5%) 14 (2.7%) 0 1 35 (6.7%)
Seld./lm Other (40) (0.2%)
Seld./lm IJV (73)
Other (23)
Moureau et al. 2002 (e31) 8210 Surg./Rad. NA NA NA 362 (4.4%) 208 (2.5%) 43 (0.5%) NA 16 (0.2%) NA
Yip et al.2002 (e32) 118 Rad. Seld/US IJV 342.8(21–813) 10 (8.5%) 5 (4.2%) 2 (1.7%) 0 0 8 (6.8%)
Biffi et al.2001 (e33) 302 Surg./Rad. Seld./lm SclV 237 55 (18.2%) 4 (1.3%) 17 (5.6%) 8 (2.6%) 1 (0.3%) 9 (3%)
Hartkamp et al. 2000 (e34) 126 Surg. NA NA 192.5(2–1091) 58 (46%) 20 (16.3%) 9 (7.3%) 1 (0.8%) 0 16 (13%)

*1This table includes studies involving more than 100 port implantations in the period 2000 to 2010.

*2Medical discipline: Surg. = surgery; Rad. = radiology; An. = anesthesia;

*3Technique: Surg. = open surgical; Seld./lm = Seldinger/landmark; Seld/US = Seldinger/ultrasound;

*4Approach: EJV = external jugular vein; IJV = internal jugular vein; SclV = subclavian vein; CephV = cephalic vein; NA = data not available;

*5Explantation due to complications