TABLE 3.
Constitutional CNVs
Detection method: | SNP array |
Mate pair |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detected by other method: | Yes | No | Yes | No | <5 probes | |
A | Gains | 4 | 98 | 4 | 22 | 22 |
B | Losses | 326 | 120 | 322 | 382 | 685 |
C | Total events | 330 | 218 | 326 | 404 | 707 |
D | False-negative calls | — | 1 (0.5%) | — | 27 (7%) | — |
E | Matches known CNV | 326 (99%) | 202 (93%) | 319 (98%) | 376 (93%) | 92 (13%) |
F | Median size (kb) | 1.8 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
G | Median fold probe density vs. array | 20.8 | 18.4 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 0.0 |
H | Median (log2R) | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.13 | — |
I | Median (Z statistic) | 13.4 | 8.9 | 13.1 | 3.0 | — |
J | Median mate pairs | — | — | 13 | 9 | 8 |
K | Median fraction mismatched bases | — | — | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
L | Created by inversion | 1 (0.3%) | ? | 1 (0.3%) | 3 (0.7%) | 66 (9%) |
M | Tandem repeat (losses only) | 112 (34%) | 82 (68%) | 170 (53%) | 291 (76%) | 458 (67%) |
?, cannot be determined; —, not applicable.