Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;187(3):865–876. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.124743

TABLE 1.

Comparison of FST values for neutral and FRP loci

wr. and mo. ba. and wr. so. and wr. ba. and mo. so. and mo. so. and ba. All
Neutral mean FST 0.60 (±0.24) 0.44 (±0.32) 0.42 (±0.32) 0.46 (±0.25) 0.53 (±0.19) 0.19 (±0.21) 0.44 (±0.24)
FRP-A 0.45* 0.13** 0.45 0.12***a −0.02***a 0.11 0.3**
FRP-B 0.26***a 0.32 0.23 0.19** 0.13***a 0.02** 0.22**a
FRP-C 0.67 0.08**a 0.45 0.28 0.25***a 0.14 0.26
FRP-D 0.00***a 0.30 0.25* 0.30 0.25***a 0.00**a 0.18***a
FRP-E 0.26***a 0.25 0.65 −0.05***a 0.26***a 0.23 0.2*
FRP mean Fst 0.33 (±0.25)* 0.21 (±0.11) 0.41 (±0.17) 0.16 (±0.14)* 0.18 (±0.12)***a 0.11 (± 0.094) 0.24 (±0.05)*a

Neutral mean Fst is calculated from loci in Machado et al. (2007). Values in parentheses represent the standard deviation. For individual loci and and subspecies, we determined whether FST values were significantly different from the neutral distribution using a Z-test. Furthermore, we compared the distribution of FST values between neutral and FRP loci using a two-sample t-test. All FST values were calculated in DnaSP (Rozas et al. 2003). wr., D. m. wrigleyi; ba., D. m. baja; so., D. m. sonorensis; mo., D. m. mojavensis. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

a

Values that remain significant after a conservative Bonferroni correction for multiple measures.