Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec 31;3(2):179–186. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.854307

Table 4.

Correlations (r) and significance (p) between the three gradients and each artery with respect to heart rate (HR) and body-mass index (BMI) in 36 patients with no CT evidence of CAD. Significant correlations (p<0.05) are highlighted. The gradient change reflects the expected influence on the gradient magnitude of heart rate (55-65 bpm) and BMI (20-30 kg/m2) variations observed for coronary CTA patients, i.e., Gradient change = regression coefficient × 10 [bpm, or, kg/m2].

Correlations for Distance Gradient
RCA LAD LCx
r Gradient change
[HU/cm]
r Gradient change
[HU/cm]
r Gradient change
[HU/cm]
HR 0.07 0.46 0.26 3.45 0.46 5.91
BMI 0.33 2.41 0.33 4.82 0.29 3.98
Correlations for Short Axis Diameter Gradient
RCA LAD LCx
r Gradient change
[HU/mm]
r Gradient change
[HU/mm]
r Gradient change
[HU/mm]
HR -0.22 -7.51 -0.35 -11.86 -0.40 -13.89
BMI -0.45 -16.35 -0.45 -16.68 -0.47 -17.73
Correlations for Cross-Sectional Area Gradient
RCA LAD LCx
r Gradient change
[HU/mm2]
r Gradient change
[HU/mm2]
r Gradient change
[HU/mm2]
HR -0.28 -2.19 -0.41 -3.48 -0.43 -4.38
BMI -0.39 -3.37 -0.38 -3.51 -0.37 -4.04