Table 1.
Summary of experiments
Challenge |
Treatment |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Rat Strain | Method of Perfusion | Agent* | Concentration, ng/ml | Drug# | Dose | No. of Rats |
1. Effect of differing edema toxin doses | Sprague-Dawley | Nonrecirculating | Diluent | 0 | 11 | ||
PA | 100 | 4 | |||||
PA | 1,000 | 4 | |||||
ETx | 50 | 5 | |||||
ETx | 100 | 5 | |||||
ETx | 200 | 5 | |||||
2. Effect of edema toxin inhibition with PA mAb | Sprague-Dawley | Recirculating | PA | 100 | Placebo | 10 | |
PA | 100 | PA mAb | 10× | 4 | |||
Diluent | 0 | PA mAb | 10× | 3 | |||
ETx | 50 | Placebo | 6 | ||||
ETx | 50 | PA mAb | 10× | 5 | |||
3. Effect of edema toxin inhibition with adefovir | Sprague-Dawley | Recirculating | PA | 100 | Diluent | 7 | |
Diluent | 0 | Adefovir | 0.001 μM | 6 | |||
Diluent | 0 | Adefovir | 0.01 μM | 3 | |||
Diluent | 0 | Adefovir | 0.1 μM | 3 | |||
ETx | 50 | Diluent | 10 | ||||
ETx | 50 | Adefovir | 0.001 μM | 4 | |||
ETx | 50 | Adefovir | 0.01 μM | 2 | |||
ETx | 50 | Adefovir | 0.1 μM | 2 | |||
4. Comparison of the effects of edema toxin and dobutamine | Sprague-Dawley | Nonrecirculating | PA | 100 | 5 | ||
Dobutamine | 12.5 | 6 | |||||
ETx | 50 | 5 | |||||
5. Effect of edema toxin on myocardial and effluent cAMP | Sprague-Dawley | Nonrecirculating | PA | 100 | Placebo | 4 | |
ETx | 50 | Placebo | 4 | ||||
ETx | 50 | PA mAb | 10× | 4 | |||
ETx | 50 | Adefovir | 0.001 μM | 4 | |||
6. Effect of differing LeTx doses | Sprague-Dawley | Nonrecirculating | Diluent | 0 | 11 | ||
PA | 100 | 4 | |||||
PA | 1,000 | 4 | |||||
LeTx | 50 | 5 | |||||
LeTx | 500 | 5 | |||||
7. Comparison of the effects of LeTx in Sprague-Dawley versus Lewis rats | Spague-Dawley | Nonrecirculating | PA | 1,000 | 3 | ||
LeTx | 500 | 3 | |||||
PA | 5,000 | 3 | |||||
LeTx | 2,500 | 3 | |||||
Lewis | Nonrecirculating | PA | 5,000 | 4 | |||
LeTx | 2,500 | 6 |
ETx, edema toxin; LeTx, lethal toxin; PA, protective antigen;
PA mAb, monoclonal antibody against PA.