Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar 1;20(3):454–463. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0974

Table 4.

Relationship between recreational physical activity (MET-hours per week) at baseline and risk of ER+ and triple-negative breast cancer

Non-cases Cases*
ER+ TN
n (%) n (%) HR (95% CI) n (%) HR (95% CI) p-value
Total recreational physical activity
  No activity 22,807 (16) 386 (16) 1.0 (ref) 54 (18) 1.0 (ref) 0.30
  0.01 – 6.50 39,080 (27) 693 (28) 1.00 (0.87–1.15) 75 (25) 0.67 (0.46–0.99)
  6.51 – 16.50 39,799 (28) 726 (29) 0.95 (0.83–1.09) 86 (29) 0.81 (0.55–1.18)
  ≥16.50 41,721 (29) 686 (28) 0.85 (0.74–0.98) 81 (27) 0.77 (0.51–1.13)
  Missing 7,121 119 11
  ptrend <0.01 0.47
Strenuous recreational physical activity§
  No activity 107,778 (75) 1,906 (73) 1.0 (ref) 215 (70) 1.0 (ref) 0.53
  0.01 – 10.49 14,098 (10) 209 (8) 0.89 (0.76–1.05) 36 (12) 1.17 (0.77–1.78)
  ≥10.50 21,531 (15) 376 (14) 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 45 (15) 0.98 (0.68–1.44)
  Missing 7,122 119 11
  ptrend 0.25 0.91
Moderate and low-intensity recreational physical activity§
  No activity 61,822 (43) 1,096 (44) 1.0 (ref) 137 (46) 1.0 (ref) 0.53
  0.01 – 5.74 40,642 (28) 680 (27) 0.90 (0.81–1.00) 88 (30) 0.83 (0.61–1.12)
  ≥5.75 40,943 (29) 715 (29) 0.88 (0.79–0.98) 71 (24) 0.75 (0.54–1.04)
  Missing 7,122 119 11
  ptrend 0.01 0.07
*

ER+ = estrogen receptor-positive cases with known HER2 expression status; triple-negative = ER−/PR−/HER2−

Adjusted for age, education, income, family history of breast cancer, race, history of mammography (at baseline), mammography during follow-up, and BMI at baseline.

Analysis of the partial likelihoods for equality between subtype-specific estimates.

§

Mutually-adjusted for strenuous-intensity and moderate/low-intensity activity.