Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e18173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018173

Table 1. Body mass, testes mass and relative testes mass of muroid rodents.

Species N Body mass (g) Testes mass (g) Relative testes mass
Arvicola terrestris 5 91.56±4.47 0.411±0.027 0.409
Chionomys nivalis 6 43.64±1.35 0.851±0.061 1.499
Clethrionomys glareolus 6 25.65±1.47 0.401±0.048 1.063
Microtus arvalis 8 36.40±3.17 0.285±0.023 0.577
Microtus cabrerae 6 44.27±2.47 0.142±0.025 0.247
Microtus duodecimcostatus 6 29.76±1.36 0.076±0.013 0.179
Microtus lusitanicus 3 17.73±0.88 0.093±0.023 0.327
Apodemus sylvaticus 8 30.43±1.70 0.961±0.054 2.236
Mus cookie 4 23.67±0.81 0.305±0.032 0.861
Mus famulus 3 27.40±0.77 0.053±0.007 0.134
Mus macedonicus 3 18.40±0.67 0.282±0.022 0.966
Mus musculus bactrianus 3 18.06±3.04 0.175±0.008 0.609
Mus musculus castaneus 3 19.50±0.33 0.100±0.006 0.326
Mus musculus domesticus 4 16.36±0.97 0.135±0.005 0.506
Mus musculus musculus 5 21.13±1.06 0.134±0.003 0.411
Mus pahari 5 30.08±0.33 0.118±0.007 0.277
Mus spicilegus 5 14.49±0.49 0.409±0.012 1.682
Mus spretus 5 17.01±0.48 0.295±0.008 1.072

Values are mean ± SEM. Relative testes mass was calculated as the ratio of observed testes mass to the predicted testes mass Y. Predicted testes mass Y for each species was calculated following Kenagy and Trombulak's [58] formula for rodents: Y = 0.031X0.77, where X is the observed body mass.