Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2010 Dec 21;36(4):381–388. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.12.017

Table 1. Description of demographics, risk factors, and DUI among Hispanic adolescents (age 15), by nativity status.

Total Immigrant US-born

Proportion Proportion F p
Men 1734 .50 .189 .311 0 1 -0.49 .623
Mexican1 1734 .583 .205 .379 0 1 1.19 .238
Cuban1 1734 .050 .016 .033 0 1 0.36 .719
Puerto Rican1 1734 .114 .026 .092* 0 1 3.19 <.001
Central American1 1734 .123 .076* .047 0 1 -2.73 .007
Other1 1734 .130 .050 .080 0 1 -0.27 .788
1st generation Immigrant 1732 -- .370 -- 0 1 -- --
2nd generation US-born 1732 -- -- .195 0 1 -- --
3rd + generation US-born 1732 -- -- .435 0 1 -- --
Spanish at home 1711 .412 .235* .179 0 1 52.51 <.001
Ever drive drunk 1730 .043 .011 .032 0 1 1.63 .107
Mean (sd) Mean (sd) t p
Age 1734 15.11 (.225) 15.47* (.277) 14.90 (.209) 11 20 -3.11 .002
Alcohol use2 1728 1.52 (.094) 1.22 (.113) 1.69* (.116) 0 7 3.46 .001
Marijuana use 1710 .275 (.025) .215 (.033) .310* (.030) 0 1 2.34 .021
Other drugs 1709 .080 (.011) .065 (.015) .089 (.014) 0 1 1.34 .184
Drunk at school 1730 .059 (.010) .049 (.013) .066 (.013) 0 1 1.12 .266
Leave home2 1705 .442 (.031) .411 (.034) .461 (.040) 0 2 1.05 .294
Group Fight2 1715 .358 (.020) .304 (.023) .389 (.032) 0 2 1.71 .090
Parental involvement3 1728 5.59 (.163) 5.50 (.230) 5.64 (.212) 0 19 0.45 .651
Peer alcohol use22 1692 1.00 (.067) .889 (.078) 1.07* (.080) 0 3 2.01 .047
Peer marijuana use2 1696 .613 (.055) .496 (.061) 0.68* (.062) 0 3 2.89 .005
School connectedness3 1699 21.64 (.201) 22.15* (.286) 21.35 (.203) 6 33 -3.04 .003
Safe Neighborhood 1715 .835 (.015) .822 (.024) .842 (.015) 0 1 0.81 .419
Seatbelt use3 1734 3.08 (.073) 3.15 (.089) 3.04 (.091) 0 4 -0.93 .355
Miles driven2 1731 1.17 (.074) 1.10 (.093) 1.21 (.077) 0 4 1.43 .156
Valid driver's license 1734 .140 (.020) .147 (.027) .136 (.023) 0 1 -0.37 .709
1

Each group was compared to all other groups as the reference group.

2

Higher values represent more risk.

3

Higher values represent less risk.