Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Phon. 2004 Jan 1;32(1):111–140. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4470(03)00009-3

Table 5.

Results of the linear multiple regression analysis on the acoustic-phonetic properties and perceptual categorization responses. For each of the dialect groups, the significant acoustic measures are shown with their regression coefficients and the overall r2 showing model fit

Significant variables Regression coefficients Overall r2
New England r-fulness −0.36 0.39
/æ/ backness 0.34
/oʊ/ diphthong −0.22
vowel brightness 0.21
North /oʊ/ diphthong −0.38 0.27
/u/ backness 0.29
North Midland /oɪ/ diphthong 0.56 0.31
South Midland /u/ backness −0.26 0.38
vowel brightness −0.34
fricative voicing 0.33
South /oɪ/ diphthong −0.39 0.49
/oʊ/ diphthong 0.33
/u/ backness −0.33
/oʊ/ backness 0.31
/æ/ diphthong 0.20
West /oɪ/ diphthong 0.40 0.16