Table 5.
Results of the linear multiple regression analysis on the acoustic-phonetic properties and perceptual categorization responses. For each of the dialect groups, the significant acoustic measures are shown with their regression coefficients and the overall r2 showing model fit
| Significant variables | Regression coefficients | Overall r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| New England | r-fulness | −0.36 | 0.39 |
| /æ/ backness | 0.34 | ||
| /oʊ/ diphthong | −0.22 | ||
| vowel brightness | 0.21 | ||
| North | /oʊ/ diphthong | −0.38 | 0.27 |
| /u/ backness | 0.29 | ||
| North Midland | /oɪ/ diphthong | 0.56 | 0.31 |
| South Midland | /u/ backness | −0.26 | 0.38 |
| vowel brightness | −0.34 | ||
| fricative voicing | 0.33 | ||
| South | /oɪ/ diphthong | −0.39 | 0.49 |
| /oʊ/ diphthong | 0.33 | ||
| /u/ backness | −0.33 | ||
| /oʊ/ backness | 0.31 | ||
| /æ/ diphthong | 0.20 | ||
| West | /oɪ/ diphthong | 0.40 | 0.16 |