Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 22;104(6):915–920. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.48

Table 1. Comparison of social deprivation scores in the two groups (ascertained by postcode).

  Self-sampling group
Cervical cytology group
  Responders Non-responders Total Responders Non-responders Total
Q1 (most deprived) 23 (5.1%) 430 (94.9%) 453 16 (4.0%) 386 (96.0%) 402
Q2 26 (6.6%) 367 (93.4%) 393 17 (4.0%) 403 (96.0%) 420
Q3 23 (6.4%) 336 (93.6%) 359 17 (4.5%) 357 (95.5%) 374
Q4 24 (8.3%) 264 (91.7%) 288 18 (6.1%) 278 (93.9%) 296
Q5 (most affluent) 0 (0.0%) 7 (100.0%) 7 0 (0.0%) 8 (100.0%) 8
Total 96 1404 1500 68 1432 1500

Responders are defined as women returning a self-sample or attending for cytology screening (not whether they returned a questionnaire).

Crown Copyright 2006.

Source: National Statistics/Ordnance Survey; extracts are Crown Copyright and may only be reproduced by permission.