Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009 Mar–Apr;16(2):98–106. doi: 10.1080/09286580902737532

Table 4.

Comparison of relative rates of nuclear sclerotic, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataract among 20,599 participants in the Physicians’ Health Study (US male physicians, 1982–1995)

Cataract Type
Nuclear Sclerotic (1,726 events) Cortical (734 events) Posterior Subcapsular (794 events) Test of equal associations across types*
HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) P-value
BMI, per 1 kg/m2 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 1.06 (1.03–1.08) 0.002
Multivitamin use 0.90 (0.80–1.00) 0.80 (0.67–0.96) 0.89 (0.75–1.05) 0.34
Family history of MI 1.12 (0.96–1.30) 1.02 (0.80–1.30) 1.27 (1.04–1.56) 0.20
Diabetes mellitus 1.23 (0.96–1.57) 1.67 (1.20–2.32) 1.76 (1.29–2.40) 0.003
Smoke <1 pack/day 1.41 (1.11–1.80) 1.26 (0.85–1.87) 1.56 (1.11–2.19) 0.71
Smoke ≥1 pack/day 1.49 (1.23–1.79) 1.57 (1.18–2.08) 1.70 (1.32–2.20)
Former smoker 1.12 (1.01–1.23) 1.19 (1.02–1.38) 1.16 (1.00–1.35)

Note: model also allows for different effects of randomized treatment assignment, treats age as the time scale and stratifies on cataract type

*

The null hypothesis is that the risk factor has the same association for all cataract types; for smoking the null hypothesis assumes each smoking variable has a uniform association across types