Table 3.
Siemens | sample 1 | sample 2 | sample 3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
transv. aortic | obl. aortic | pulm | transv. aortic | obl. aortic | pulm | transv. aortic | obl. aortic | pulm | ||
gradient amplitude | cm/s per mT/m | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.07 |
slew rate | cm/s per mT/m/s | 2.28 | 0.85 | -0.86 | 2.23 | 1.23 | 0.14 | 0.85 | -0.34 | 0.3 |
r2 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.81 |
Results from beyond protocol variation by multiple regression of gradient amplitude and slew rate on velocity offset. All correlations found were highly significant (P < < 0.01) but not very strong and varied considerably among scanner samples of the same type. As an example, the data points of sample 2 are shown in Figure 5.