Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 14;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-73

Table 2.

Summary of quality measures for temperature calibration.

Hyb. Temp., k accfly Ifly
graphic file with name 1471-2105-12-73-i22.gif
nsig accspk Ispk
graphic file with name 1471-2105-12-73-i23.gif
Hyb 47 C 71.74 0.405 -67616 2925 71.05 0.106 -19780

Hyb 49 C 72.25 0.417 -65697 1979 74.14 0.234 -16810

Hyb 50 C (a) 74.06 0.451 -60972 3201 71.94 0.133 -18930

Hyb 50 C (b) 75.05 0.461 -60111 3628 73.28 0.261 -16454

Hyb 51 C 75.06 0.467 -58616 3810 74.10 0.341 -14683

Hyb 52 C 71.79 0.402 -68745 2140 73.16 0.156 -18357

Hyb 54 C 70.35 0.385 -70643 2348 68.34 0.184 -18371

Hyb 56 C 64.25 0.292 -83426 1213 60.64 0.094 -20323

The left part of the table shows results from the protocol assessment using biological samples for calibration ('fly'). In comparison, the corresponding results for spiked-in exogenic RNAs are shown on the right ('spk'). Column 'Hyb. Temp., K' lists the considered protocol K and its hybridization temperature. For each protocol, the table displays the achieved generalization accuracies ('acc'), the average mutual information I, the log likelihoods log Inline graphic and the number n of genes with differential expression calls by FSPMA ANOVA at a 1% FDR threshold. The generalization accuracy reflects protocol performance for equal misclassification costs. ROC curves are provided for the generic case (Fig. 4). Detailed results for each protocol can be found in the Supplement.