Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 3;20(4):640–648. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1643-z

Table 2.

18F-fluoride uptake around cages in 20 patients with 30 cervical and/or lumbar intercorporal fusions

Patient no. Segment cervical spine Segment lumbar spine Time in months between last intercorporal intervention and PET/CT Increased uptake, yes (1)/no (0) Materiala
1 C4/5, 5/6, 6/7 92 (3×) 0, 0, 1 ID HWS Cage, Titanium (3×)
2 L5/S1 (left) 17 1 Telamon Titanium
3 C5/6, 6/7 30 (2×) 1, 1 ID HWS Cage, Titanium (2×)
4 L4/5 13 1 Telamon Titanium
5 L4/5, L5/S1 102 (L4/5), 35 (L5/S1) 0, 0 ProSpace Titanium, Telamon Titanium
6 L4/5 107 0 ProSpace Titanium
7 C5/6 L2/3, L4/5 37 (C5/6), 2 (L2/3), 69 (L4/5) 1, 1, 0 ID HWS Cage, Titanium, KZC, Titaniumb, ProSpace Titanium
8 C3/4, C4/5 L5/S1 79 (C3–5), 80 (L5/S1) 1, 1, 0 ID HWS Cage, Titanium (2×), ProSpace Titanium
9 L4/5 47 1 Telamon Titanium
10 L5/S1 27 1 Telamon Titanium
11 C5/6 90 0 ID HWS Cage, Titanium
12 L5/S1 112 0 Diapason Titanium
13 L4/5 19 0 Telamon Titanium
14 L4/5 100 0 ProSpace Titanium
15 C5/6, C6/7 34 (2×) 0, 0 ID HWS Cage, Titanium (2×)
16 L5/S1 116 1 Harms Titanium
17 L5/S1 74 1 ProSpace Titanium
18 C5/6 84 1 ID HWS Cage, Titanium
19 C5/6 L3/4 91 (C5/6), 106 (L3/4) 0, 0 ID HWS Cage, Titanium, ProSpace Titanium
20 L5/S1 14 1 ProSpace Titanium

ID Implant design

aMaterial named includes registered trademarks ®

bKZC Karl Zweifel Cage