Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):823–836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60096-2

Table 5.

Participant-rated clinical global impression of change in overall health

Adaptive pacing therapy (n=159) Cognitive behaviour therapy (n=161) Graded exercise therapy (n=160) Specialist medical care alone (n=160)
Change from baseline
12 weeks 153 (96%) 153 (95%) 151 (94%) 151 (94%)
Positive change 20 (13%) 32 (21%) 37 (25%) 7 (5%)
Minimum change 126 (82%) 113 (74%) 111 (74%) 133 (88%)
Negative change 7 (5%) 8 (5%) 3 (2%) 11 (7%)
24 weeks 155 (97%) 149 (93%) 148 (93%) 151 (94%)
Positive change 37 (24%) 56 (38%) 54 (37%) 28 (19%)
Minimum change 111 (72%) 82 (55%) 89 (60%) 107 (71%)
Negative change 7 (5%) 11 (7%) 5 (3%) 16 (11%)
52 weeks 153 (96%) 147 (91%) 152 (95%) 152 (95%)
Positive change 47 (31%) 61 (41%) 62 (41%) 38 (25%)
Minimum change 96 (63%) 77 (52%) 80 (53%) 100 (66%)
Negative change 10 (7%) 9 (6%) 10 (7%) 14 (9%)
Odds ratio (positive change vs negative or minimum changes)
Compared with specialist medical care 1·3 (0·8–2·1); p=0·31 2·2 (1·2–3·9); p=0·011 2·0 (1·2–3·5); p=0·013 ..
Compared with adaptive pacing therapy .. 1·7 (1·0–2·7); p=0·034 1·5 (1·0–2·3); p=0·028 ..

Data are n (%) or odds ratio (95% CI). Comparisons made at 52 weeks were taken from the final adjusted models. Positive change was defined as very much better or much better. Minimum change was defined as a little better, no change, or a little worse. Negative change was defined as much worse or very much worse.