Skip to main content
. 2000 Aug 1;19(15):4164–4174. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.15.4164

graphic file with name cdd382f8.jpg

Fig. 8. Translocation defects of srp14C29 cells in the UTA assay. (A) Organization of UTA constructs. The protein is depicted N- to C-terminus; signal sequence (SS), spacer (SPACER), ubiquitin (UBI) and Ura3p. The cleavage site for cytosolic ubiquitin-dependent proteases is indicated (arrow). (B and Csrp14C29 cells streaked on to a –trp (B; selecting for the plasmids) and a –ura (C; selecting for cytosolic Ura3p) plate were incubated for 2 days at 30°C. They contained empty vector (top left), Suc2277 (top right), Dap2300 (bottom left) or the control substrate Suc223, which has a 23 amino acid spacer (bottom right). (D and E) As for (B) and (C) but with wild-type cells. As seen previously (Johnsson and Varshavsky, 1994), Suc223 gave a Ura+ phenotype in wild-type cells. (F) Anti-HA immunoprecipitations from extracts of pulse-labelled cells expressing Suc2518UbDHFRHA (lanes 1–3) or Suc223UbDHFRHA control, which only yields the DHFRHA fragment (lane 4) (Johnsson and Varshavski, 1994). Labelling of cells and analysis are as in Figure 7.