Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Oncol. 2011 Apr;38(2):284–308. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.01.001

TABLE 3.

Pivotal adjuvant CC clinical trials

Author

Trial Namea
Journal Regimen
Tested
Number of
Patients
Stage Primary
Endpointb
Significance
OXALIPLATIN TRIALS
Kuebler et al75

NSABP- C-07
JCO,
2007
FLOX


vs

5FULV
1207


vs

1200
II – 28.9%
III-70.9%

vs

II-28.8%
III-70.5%
4 yr DFS
73.2% vs 67%

4 yr OS
78.5% vs 76%

p<0.0034
Andre et
al74,76

MOSAIC
JCO,
2009
FOLFOX4


vs

LV5FU2
1108


vs

1111
II - 40.2%
III-59.8%

vs

II-39.9%
III-60.1%
6 yr DFS
73.3% vs 67.4%

6 yr OS
78.5% vs 76%

p<0.003
Haller et al

XELOXA
NO16968
GI
ASCO,
2010

Abstr.
284
CapeOx

vs

5FULV

N= 1886

III only
5 yr DFS

66.1% vs 59.8%

OS
Not reported



p<0.0045
RINOTECAN TRIALS
Saltz et al78

CALGB 89803
JCO,
2007
IFL

vs

5FULV
635

vs

629


III only
5 yr OS

68% vs 71%


p=0.85 NS
Van Cutsem et
al80

PETACC-3
JCO,
2009
FOLFIRI


vs

LV5FU2
1485


vs

1497
II – 29.3%
III-70.3%

vs

II-29.7%
III-70%
5 yr DFS

56.7% vs 54.3%

5 yr OS
73.6% vs 71.3%
NS


p=0.106 NS
Ychou et al79


ACCORD-2
Ann
Oncol,
2009
FOLFIRI

vs

LV5FU2
161

vs

160

Resected
IV
DFS

24.7 vs 21.6

3 yr OS
73% vs 72% NS


p=0.44 NS
CAPECITABINE
Twelves et
al81

X-ACT
NEJM,
2005
Cape

vs

5FULV
1004

vs

983


III only
3 yr DFS
non-inferiority

64.2% vs 60.6%

3 yr OS
81.3% vs 77.6%
NS
Superiority
p=0.12 NS

Equivalence
p<001
Haller et al

XELOXA
NO16968
GI
ASCO,
2010

Abstr.
284
CapeOx

vs

5FULV

N= 1886

III only
5 yr DFS

66.1% vs 59.8%

OS
Not reported


p<0.0045
ANTI-ANGIOGENESIS: BEVACIZUMAB
Wolmark et al

NSABP C-08
ASCO,
2009

Abstr.
LBA4
FOLFOX6 +
bev

vs

FOLFOX6
1334

vs

1338

II – 24.9%

III –75.1%
3 yr DFS

77.4% vs 75.5%


p=0.15 NS
AVANT Ongoing FOLFOX4 +
bev
or
XELOX +
bev

vs

FOLFOX4

1150




vs

1150
High risk
II

+

III
DFS
ANTI-EGFR: CETUXIMAB
Alberts et al

N0147
ASCO,
2010

Abstr.
CRA-
3507
FOLFOX6 +
cetuximab

vs

FOLFOX6
902


vs

858

III only

KRAS wt
only
3 yr DFS

74.1% vs 73.3%

3 yr OS
87.3% vs 82.1%
NS


p=0.33 NS
PETACC-8 Ongoing FOLFOX+
cetuximab

vs

FOLFOX
N=
>6000
III only

KRAS wt
only
3 yr DFS First interim
analysis
planned 2011
a

Randomized Phase III trials unless otherwise specified.

b

Units indicated in months unless otherwise indicated.

DFS, disease free survival; OS, overall survival; Cape, capecitabine; NS, not significant; Bev, bevacizumab; wt, wild type.