Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 29;35(4):561–567. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1068-7

Table 1.

Patient demographic and preoperative data

Group A (n = 36) Group B (n = 36) P value
Apical vertebra
  T6–T6/7 2 (5.6%) 2 (5.6%) Matched design
  T7–T8 15 (41.7%) 15 (41.7%)
  T8/9–T10 19 (52.7%) 19 (52.7%)
Neutral vertebra
  L1–L3 24 (66.7%) 24 (66.7%) Matched design
  T10–T12 12 (33.3%) 12 (33.3%)
Age (years)a 13.56 ± 1.17 13.70 ± 1.34 0.648
Risser signb
  0 3 (8.3%) 2 (5.6%) 0.967
  1 1 (2.8%) 1 (2.8%)
  2 6 (16.7%) 8 (22.2%)
  3 12 (33.3%) 11 (30.6%)
  4 13 (36.1%) 12 (33.3%)
  5 1 (2.8%) 2 (5.6%)
Duration of follow-up (years)a 3.03 ± 0.75 2.99 ± 0.54 0.831
Preoperative data
  Side-bindinga 17.11 ± 8.27 19.36 ± 7.91 0.242
  Cobb angle (°)a 52.47 ± 10.83 52.97 ± 9.85 0.828
  Sagittal T5 T12 (°)a 20.53 ± 4.83 21.42 ± 4.63 0.428
  T10 L2 Cobb (°)a 9.25 ± 4.87 8.19 ± 5.41 0.387
  LIV tilt (cm)a 20.69 ± 5.67 21.17 ± 5.75 0.718
  Plumb line deviation from the CSVL (cm)a 1.40 ± 0.82 1.29 ± 0.70 0.529

P values are based on aindependent two-sample t test and bMann-Whitney U test

Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage)