Table 3.
Multiple regression equations used to identify predictors of VAT and SAT volumes
Equations | ||
---|---|---|
VAT volume (cm3) = | 23 (age) + 21 (weight) + 32.5 (%FM) − 1930 | R2 = 0.63, P = 0.025 |
9 (age) − 1.9 (weight) + 37 (%FM) + 6.5 (L3–L4 CSA)* − 648 | R2 = 0.81, P = 0.006 | |
SAT volume (cm3) = | 25 (weight) + 127 (%FM) − 42 (age) − 1929 | R2 = 0.71, P = 0.009 |
4 (weight) + 83 (%FM) − 21 (age) − 7 (L3–L5 CSA)** − 1027. | R2 = 0.81, P = 0.005 |
*It should be noted that that the use of L3, L3–L4, L4, and L4–L5 CSAs is considered a significant predictor for measuring VAT volume.
**The use of a single slice CSA did not improve the prediction of SAT volume compared to the average CSA of the four slices between L3 and L5.