Table 2.
Potential confounder variables |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) | Smoking (current vs. never) | ADL score (≥ 1 points) | Cognitive impairment (yes vs. no) | Rosow-Breslau (≥1 impairments) | |
EPESE studies † | 3.70 | 1.37 | |||
Branch et al. ‡ | 3.66 | ||||
Ramos et al. § | 3.00 | ||||
Corrada et al. ∥ | 1.12 | ||||
Freedman et al. ¶ | 1.15 | ||||
Hu et al. ¥ | 1.69 | ||||
Doll et al. β | 2.50 | ||||
Dewey et al. Ψ | 2.63 | ||||
Mean | 1.32 | 2.50 | 3.45 | 2.63 | 1.37 |
In case of conflicting literature estimates the mean estimate was used.
From the Duke and Iowa Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE), 10,297 community-dwelling adults 65 years and older.28 The relative rate estimate of 3.7 for ADL score is the average estimate of the odds ratios for East Boston (4.0), Iowa (4.2), and New Haven (3.0, see Table 2 of original paper). The relative rate of 1.37 for the Rosow-Breslau Score is an estimate from the curves on Figure 3 of the original paper.
From a prospective study on 1,625 community-dwelling elderly (age 65+) in Massachusetts, Table 2.29
From a nationwide US cohort of 83,744 radiologic technologists aged 55+.32 The relative risk of 1.15 was calculated from data provided in Table 3 of original paper.
From a cohort of 116,564 female registered nurses in the US.33 Relative risk of 1.69 was calculated from exposure and death data provided in Table 3 of original article.