Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 17;77(4):1359–1367. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02032-10

TABLE 5.

Habitat distributions of putative ecotypes demarcated by ecotype simulation and AdaptML

Gene PE
No. of sequences from:
Habitat specificitye P valuef
Ecotype simulation AdaptML M60 M65
apcABb g A 20 35 M65 0.098
g Ba 4 0 M60
2 C 0 3 M65
3 D 2 0 M60
4 1 0 M60
5 1 0 M60
aroAc 1 A 52 12 M60 0.015
2 2 0 M60
4 1 0 M60
3 B 0 3 M65
rbsKd 1 A 6 0 M60 <0.001
2 4 0 M60
3 1 0 M60
4 B 1 1 M65
5 C 1 2 M65
6 1 3 M65
7 D 1 1 M65
8 E 3 1 M60
9 F 0 7 M65
10 G 17 5 M60
11 H 0 5 M65
12 1 5 M65
13 0 5 M65
14 I 0 1 M65
a

AdaptML ecotype B of apcAB contained the four sequences M60c639B6, M60c504C8, M60c096H4, and M60c494H7 from ecotype simulation PE1.

b

For apcAB, ecotypes with an M60 habitat spectrum were estimated by AdaptML to occur 93% of the time at 60°C and 7% of the time at 65°C; ecotypes with an M65 habitat spectrum were estimated to occur 33% of the time at 60°C and 67% of the time at 65°C.

c

For aroA, ecotypes with an M60 habitat spectrum were estimated to occur 79% of the time at 60°C and 21% of the time at 65°C; ecotypes with an M65 habitat spectrum were estimated to occur 22% of the time at 60°C and 78% of the time at 65°C.

d

For rbsK, ecotypes with an M60 habitat spectrum were estimated to occur 83% of the time at 60°C and 17% of the time at 65°C; ecotypes with an M65 habitat spectrum were estimated to occur 13% of the time at 60°C and 87% of the time at 65°C.

e

Indicated by AdaptML.

f

Fisher's exact test was employed as a contingency test for differences in habitat associations among ecotype simulation's putative ecotypes (only PE clades with >1 sequence were included).

g

Part of 1 PE.