Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2011 Jan 14;77(5):1896–1899. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02879-10

Ammonium Availability Affects the Ratio of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria to Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea in Simulated Creek Ecosystems

Martina Herrmann 1,, Andrea Scheibe 1,§,, Sharon Avrahami 1,, Kirsten Küsel 1,*
PMCID: PMC3067275  PMID: 21239545

Abstract

The ammonia-oxidizing microbial community colonizing clay tiles in flow channels changed in favor of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria during a 12-week incubation period even at originally high ratios of ammonia-oxidizing archaea to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB). AOB predominance was established more rapidly in flow channels incubated at 350 μM NH4+ than in those incubated at 50 or 20 μM NH4+. Biofilm-associated potential nitrification activity was first detected after 28 days and was positively correlated with bacterial but not archaeal amoA gene copy numbers.


Nitrogen transformation processes in small-river ecosystems are primarily associated with the sediment or epilithic biofilms (4, 5, 18). Here, nitrification as the first step in coupled nitrification-denitrification is a key step in the removal of the allochthonous nitrogen load, preventing the eutrophication of downstream ecosystems (1, 5, 29, 39). The activity and community composition of biofilm-associated nitrifying microorganisms have been investigated extensively in wastewater treatment systems (27, 36), in drinking water distribution systems (17, 41), and in lakes, large rivers, and estuaries (7, 19, 21, 39) but only rarely in small-creek ecosystems. The first and rate-limiting step in nitrification, oxidation of ammonia, is carried out by ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) (14) and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) (16). Molecular surveys targeting the amoA gene, which encodes catalytic subunit A of ammonia monooxygenase, the key enzyme of ammonia oxidation (33), as well as cultivation-based studies, indicated that pH (26), salinity (25, 34), and especially ammonium availability (6, 22) could play important roles in the ecological niche differentiation of AOA and AOB. However, only little is known about archaeal versus bacterial ammonia oxidizers in creek or river ecosystems or about the association of AOA with biofilms (37, 43). In this study, we used flow channels (FC) as simulated creek ecosystems to investigate the influence of ammonium availability (i) on the establishment of biofilm-associated nitrification activity, (ii) on the community composition of biofilm-associated AOA and AOB, and (iii) on temporal patterns of the abundance of AOA and AOB during a 12-week incubation period.

FC experiment.

Water for FC was obtained from three shell limestone creeks (Ammerbach, Leutra South, and Leutra North) located near the city of Jena (Thuringia, Germany). The creeks differed in their nutrient concentrations, with the highest nutrient load at Ammerbach resulting from diffuse wastewater inputs (Table 1). Flow velocities ranged from 0.105 ± 0.092 to 0.230 ± 0.224 m s−1. Plexiglas FC measuring 160 by 10 by 18 cm (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) were set up in triplicate for each creek. Concentrations of NH4+ in the water phase of the FC were adjusted to 350 μmol liter−1 (Ammerbach; FC 1 to 3), 50 μmol liter−1 (Leutra South, FC 4 to 6), and 20 μmol liter−1 (Leutra North, FC 7 to 9) to run the experiment at three distinct levels of NH4+. pHs and concentrations of NH4+ were monitored during the experiment (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Clay tiles measuring 4.7 by 4.7 cm were used to provide surfaces for biofilm development. The FC were run at 13°C in the dark at a circulation velocity of 0.3 m s−1 for 12 weeks, starting on 8 August 2006. A period of 12 weeks was considered representative of biofilm development under natural conditions, where colonization of new substrata occurs rapidly (30) and, in turn, high flow velocities, i.e., during flood events, may cause significant removal of epilithic biofilms (23), thus keeping them in early developmental stages. The water in the FC was replaced by freshly sampled water from the corresponding creeks on days 1, 15, 30, 51, and 72 of the experiment (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Chemical analysis of the water (9, 42) was performed at each sampling time. Due to leakage problems, FC 2 and 9 had to be terminated at an early stage of the experiment.

TABLE 1.

Hydrological and physicochemical characteristics of the three creeks in this studya

Site Width (m) Depth (m) pH Concn (μmol liter−1) of:
NH4+ NH3 NO3 PO43−
Ammerbach 1.8 0.24 ± 0.05 7.8 ± 0.3 674.4 ± 583.5 16.94 ± 14.66 1,028 ± 219 35.6 ± 13.3
Leutra South 2.4 0.21 ± 0.03 8.3 ± 0.3 14.7 ± 6.7 0.79 ± 0.36 817 ± 88.0 0.8 ± 0.5
Leutra North 2 0.18 ± 0.04 7.8 ± 0.1 7.4 ± 5.4 0.13 ± 0.09 616 ± 59.7 3.0 ± 2.9
a

Values are mean results ± standard deviations obtained at five sampling times (except for width).

PNA.

Duplicate clay tiles from each FC were incubated with phosphate buffer (0.001 M, pH 7.4) and 0.5 mM NH4+ at 13°C with constant agitation (100 rpm) for 8 h, and rates of potential nitrification activity (PNA) were determined by linear regression of the cumulative increase in NO2 and NO3 concentrations over time. PNA remained at a very low level in the FC run at low ammonium concentrations, with maximum rates of 2.5 to 4.5 nmol NO2 + NO3 cm−2 h−1(Leutra South) and 0.9 nmol NO2 + NO3 cm−2 h−1(Leutra North) after 83 days of incubation (Fig. 1). In contrast, PNA was 28.1 nmol NO2 + NO3 cm−2 h−1 already after 55 days of incubation at 350 μmol liter−1 NH4+ (Fig. 1), indicating that ammonium availability had a stimulating effect on both the establishment and the intensity of biofilm-associated nitrification activity, as previously reported (3). Maximum rates were similar to activities measured at the oxic/anoxic interface of river sediments (18 to 45 nmol cm−2 h−1) (7) but in the lower range of activities reported from river and estuary biofilms (10 to 171 nmol cm−2 h−1) (13, 19, 20, 38).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Biofilm-associated PNA (nmol NO3 + NO2 cm−2 h−1) of the different FC with ongoing incubation. FC 1 and 3, Ammerbach; FC 4 to 6, Leutra South; FC 7 and 8, Leutra North.

Community composition and abundance of ammonia oxidizers.

Water samples (500 ml) for molecular analysis were obtained from the FC on days 58, 65, and 72 of the experiment before the water was exchanged and from the creeks on days 30, 51, and 72 (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) and filtered through 0.2-μm cellulose acetate filters (Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany). Biofilm was sampled from clay tiles of each FC on days 37, 49, and 85 (FC 5, day 71; see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) by scraping off the biofilm into 50 ml of sterile double-distilled water, followed by filtration over cellulose acetate filters. DNA was extracted from the filters by phenol-chloroform extraction as described elsewhere (24).

Archaeal and bacterial amoA genes were amplified from the creek water and from water phase and biofilm samples from all FC and time points (see supplemental material). Analysis of the PCR products by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis suggested a clear effect of ammonium availability on the community composition of AOA and AOB but only small differences between water phase- and biofilm-associated communities (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material) or between different sampling times (data not shown). For a more detailed analysis of the biofilm-associated communities, three clone libraries for AOA amoA (Abf-AOA, LSbf-AOA, and LNbf-AOA) or AOB amoA (Abf-AOB, LSbf-AOB, and LNbf-AOB) were generated (see supplemental material).

The majority of the archaeal AmoA sequences affiliated with the “soil and other environments” cluster as proposed by Francis et al. (8) and Prosser and Nicol (31), while only a few sequences affiliated with the “marine water and other environments” cluster (31) (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). Here, sequences formed a cluster together with sequences obtained from groundwater (32) and from a drinking water distribution system (41), which may point to a special affiliation of this group with freshwater environments. However, we did not detect novel AOA AmoA clusters that would indicate the existence of special creek-associated AOA. Bacterial AmoA sequences obtained from the biofilms of the Leutra South and Leutra North FC were affiliated exclusively with Nitrosospira-related sequences (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material), while about half of the clones from the Ammerbach FC (19 out of 34) were affiliated with the Nitrosomonas europaea lineage (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). These findings agree well with the previously reported adaption of members of this lineage to high NH4+ concentrations (2, 15), while members of the Nitrosospira clusters are often better competitors in low-substrate environments (35).

Copy numbers of bacterial and archaeal amoA genes in association with the water phase and the biofilms of the FC were determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using primers Arch-AmoAF/Arch-AmoAR (8) and AmoA-1F/AmoA-2R (33), respectively, with SensiMix SYBR Low-ROX Mastermix (Quantace) on an Mx3000P instrument (Agilent) with cycling conditions as described previously (10) and in the supplemental material. Numbers of archaeal and bacterial amoA gene copies, as well as AOB amoA/AOA amoA gene ratios, in the original creek water were positively correlated with the ammonium concentrations and the calculated concentrations of free NH3 in the water phase (Table 2), suggesting a positive effect of substrate availability on the population size of ammonia oxidizers (28) and an increasing importance of AOB under conditions of higher substrate availability. The observed numerical predominance of AOA at low ammonium concentrations (Leutra South and Leutra North field samples, Fig. 2 A) agrees with previous findings on freshwater sediments or soils (6, 11, 12) and is likely to be based on an extremely high substrate affinity of archaeal ammonia oxidizers (22, 40).

TABLE 2.

Correlationa between AOB amoA and AOA amoA gene copy numbers or AOB amoA/AOA amoA gene ratios and concentrations of NH4+ or calculated concentrations of NH3 in original creek waterb or biofilm-associated PNA in FCc

Parameter Correlation with creek water characteristic:
Correlation with biofilm-associated PNA in FC
NH4+ concn (μmol liter−1) Calculated NH3 concn (μmol liter−1)
AOA amoA gene copy no. 0.87e 0.92d 0.43
AOB amoA gene copy no. 0.94d 0.96d 0.72d
AOB amoA/AOA amoA gene ratio 0.87e 0.87e 0.70d
a

Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

b

n = 9.

c

n = 21.

d

P ≤ 0.001.

e

P ≤ 0.01.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

AOB amoA and AOA amoA gene copy numbers per liter in the water phase (A) or per cm−2 in the biofilm-associated communities (B) of FC. Field samples (creek water from Ammerbach, Leutra South, and Leutra North) were obtained on days 30, 51, and 72 of the experiment. The FC water phase was sampled on days 58, 65, and 72 of the experiment (7, 14, and 21 days after replacement of the FC water with freshly sampled creek water). Biofilm samples were obtained after 37, 49, and 85 days of incubation (FC 5, last sampling time after 71 days). Columns represent means and standard deviations of triplicate qPCR measurements. The water phase sample from FC 1 after 65 days was excluded from quantitative analysis because the yield of environmental DNA was too low to obtain reliable results. Archaeal and bacterial amoA gene copy numbers were below the detection limit of the qPCR for the FC 7 biofilm sample after 85 days of incubation.

AOB amoA/AOA amoA gene ratios changed in favor of AOB during the 12-week incubation period in both the water phase- and biofilm-associated communities of all FC. In the water phase, the AOB amoA/AOA amoA ratios increased by more than 2 orders of magnitude within only 3 weeks (Fig. 2A). In the biofilm-associated communities, AOB amoA genes outnumbered AOA amoA genes by more than 1 order of magnitude after 49 or 85 days of incubation at 50 or 20 μmol liter−1 NH4+ (Leutra South, Leutra North). In contrast, a clear predominance of AOB was already established after 37 days of incubation at 350 μmol liter−1 NH4+ (Ammerbach, Fig. 2B), probably due to higher growth rates of AOB at increased NH4+ concentrations. Interestingly, a predominance of AOB was established in all of the FC even though the FC water was replaced with freshly sampled creek water five times during the incubation period, each time reintroducing ammonia-oxidizing populations where AOA were about equally abundant or more numerous than AOB.

Biofilm-associated PNA was positively correlated with AOB amoA/AOA amoA gene ratios and with the numbers of bacterial amoA gene copies but not with archaeal amoA gene copies (Table 2), suggesting that the enrichment of AOB in the biofilm-associated communities contributed to the observed increase in nitrification potential with ongoing incubation. High ammonium concentrations, such as in the Ammerbach FC, a constant supply of ammonium, avoiding periods of NH4+ deficiency, compared to field conditions obviously favored bacterial over archaeal ammonia oxidizers under the experimental conditions of this study. Similarly, a stimulating effect of substrate availability on the growth of AOB but not AOA has recently been observed in grassland soil mesocosms incubated with animal urine (6). The results obtained in our study provide clear experimental evidence that ammonium availability is an important factor influencing AOB/AOA ratios in aquatic ecosystems.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HQ401373 to HQ401474 (archaeal amoA) and HQ401475 to HQ401562 (bacterial amoA).

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the European Commission Marie Curie Action for Transfer of Knowledge (TOK) (project 29983) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (projects HE 5205/2-1 and HE 5205/3-1).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 14 January 2011.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baldwin, D. S., A. M. Mitchell, G. N. Rees, G. O. Watson, and J. L. Williams. 2006. Nitrogen processing by biofilms along a lowland river continuum. River Res. Appl. 22:319-326. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bollmann, A., M.-J. Bär-Gilissen, and H. J. Laanbroek. 2002. Growth at low ammonium concentrations and starvation response as potential factors involved in niche differentiation among ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4751-4757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Butturini, A., T. J. Battin, and F. Sabater. 2000. Nitrification in stream sediment biofilms: the role of ammonium concentration and DOC quality. Water Res. 34:629-639. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cooper, B. 1984. Activities of benthic nitrifiers in streams and their role in oxygen consumption. Microb. Ecol. 10:317-334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DeLaune, R. D., L. M. Salinas, R. S. Knox, M. N. Sarafyan, and C. J. Smith. 1991. Water quality of a coastal river receiving nutrient inputs: ammonium nitrogen transformations. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 26:1287-1302. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Di, H. J., et al. 2010. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea grown under contrasting soil nitrogen conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 72:386-394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eriksson, P. G., and S. E. B. Weisner. 1999. An experimental study on effects of submersed macrophytes on nitrification and denitrification in ammonium-rich aquatic systems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44:1993-1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Francis, C. A., K. J. Roberts, J. M. Beman, A. E. Santoro, and B. B. Oakley. 2005. Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:14683-14688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grasshoff, K., M. Ehrhardt, and K. Kremling. 1983. Methods of seawater analysis, 2nd ed. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.
  • 10.Herrmann, M., A. M. Saunders, and A. Schramm. 2008. Archaea dominate the ammonia-oxidizing community in the rhizosphere of the freshwater macrophyte Littorella uniflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3279-3283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Herrmann, M., A. M. Saunders, and A. Schramm. 2009. Effect of lake trophic status and rooted macrophytes on diversity and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in freshwater sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:3127-3136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Höfferle, S., et al. 2010. Ammonium supply rate influences archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidizers in a wetland soil vertical profile. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74:302-315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kabelkova-Jancarkova, I. 2006. Dynamics of the nitrogen transformation in a shallow stream and possible interventions. Water Sci. Technol. 54:331-338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Könneke, M., et al. 2005. Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature 437:543-546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koops, H.-P., and A. Pommerening-Röser. 2001. Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphasizing cultured species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 37:1-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koops, H. P., U. Purkhold, A. Pommerening-Röser, G. Timmermann, and M. Wagner. 2003. The lithoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, p. 778-811. In M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (ed.), The prokaryotes, 3rd ed., vol. 5. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lipponen, M. T. T., et al. 2004. Occurrence of nitrifiers and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in developing drinking water biofilms. Water Res. 38:4424-4434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lock, M. A. 1993. Attached microbial communities in rivers, p. 113-138. In T. E. Ford (ed.), Aquatic microbiology—an ecological approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • 19.Lyautey, E., S. Teissier, J.-Y. Charcosset, J.-L. Rols, and F. Garabétian. 2003. Bacterial diversity of epilithic biofilm assemblages of an anthropised river section, assessed by DGGE analysis of a 16S rDNA fragment. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 33:217-224. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Magalhâes, C. M., W. J. Wiebe, S. B. Joye, and A. A. Bordalo. 2005. Inorganic nitrogen dynamics in intertidal rocky biofilms and sediments of the Douro River estuary (Portugal). Estuaries 28:592-607. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Magalhâes, C. M., Bano, W. J. Wiebe, J. T. Hollibaugh, and A. A. Bordalo. 2007. Composition and activity of beta-proteobacterial communities associated with intertidal rocky biofilms and sediments of the Duoro River estuary, Portugal. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:1239-1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Martens-Habbena, W., P. M. Berube, H. Urakawa, J. R. de la Torre, and D. A. Stahl. 2009. Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying archaea and bacteria. Nature 461:976-981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marxsen, J. 2001. Bacterial production in different streambed habitats of an upland stream: sandy versus coarse gravelly sediments. Arch. Hydrobiol. 152:543-565. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Minz, D., et al. 1999. Diversity in sulfate reducing bacteria in oxic and anoxic regions of a microbial mat characterized by comparative analysis of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4666-4671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mosier, A. C., and C. A. Francis. 2008. Relative abundance and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in the San Francisco Bay estuary. Environ. Microbiol. 10:3002-3016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nicol, G. W., S. Leininger, C. Schleper, and J. I. Prosser. 2008. The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance, and transcriptional activity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2966-2978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Okabe, S., H. Satoh, and Y. Watanabe. 1999. In situ analysis of nitrifying biofilms as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:3182-3191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Okano, Y., et al. 2004. Application of real-time PCR to study the effects of ammonium on population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1008-1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peterson, B. J., et al. 2001. Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pohlon, E., J. Marxsen, and K. Küsel. 2010. Pioneering bacterial and algal communities and potential extracellular enzyme activities of stream biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 71:364-373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Prosser, J. I., and G. W. Nicol. 2008. Relative contributions of archaea and bacteria to aerobic ammonia oxidation in the environment. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2931-2941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reed, D. W., J. M. Smith, C. A. Francis, and Y. Fujita. 2010. Responses of ammonia-oxidizing bacterial and archaeal populations to organic nitrogen amendments in low-nutrient groundwater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:2517-2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rotthauwe, J.-H., K.-P. Witzel, and W. Liesack. 1997. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4704-4712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Santoro, A. E., C. A. Francis, N. R. de Sieyes, and A. B. Boehm. 2008. Shifts in the relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea across physicochemical gradients in a subterranean estuary. Environ. Microbiol. 10:1068-1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schramm, A., D. de Beer, H. van den Heuvel, S. Ottengraf, and R. Amann. 1999. Microscale distribution of populations and activities of Nitrosospira and Nitrospira spp. along a macroscale gradient in a nitrifying bioreactor: quantification by in situ hybridization and the use of microsensors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:3690-3696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schramm, A., D. De Beer, A. Gieseke, and R. Amann. 2000. Microenvironments and distribution of nitrifying bacteria in a membrane-bound biofilm. Environ. Microbiol. 2:680-686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spear, J. R., H. A. Barton, C. E. Robertson, C. A. Francis, and N. R. Pace. 2007. Microbial community biofabrics in a geothermal mine adit. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:6172-6180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Teissier, S., and M. Torre. 2002. Simultaneous assessment of nitrification and denitrification on freshwater epilithic biofilms by acetylene block method. Water Res. 36:3803-3811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Teissier, S., F. Garabetian, M. Torre, D. Dalger, and L. Labroue. 2002. Impact of an urban centre on the nitrogen cycle processes of epilithic biofilms during a summer low-water period. River Res. Appl. 18:21-30. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Valentine, D. A. 2007. Adaptations to energy stress dictate the ecology and evolution of the archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:316-323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van der Wielen, P. W. J. J., S. Voost, and D. van der Kooij. 2009. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in groundwater treatment and drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4687-4695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Velghe, N., and A. Claeys. 1985. Rapid spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in mineral waters with resorcinol. Analyst 110:313-314. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Weidler, G. W., M. Dornmayer-Phaffenhuemer, F. W. Gerbl, W. Heinen, and H. Stan-Lotter. 2007. Communities of archaea and bacteria in a subsurface radioactive thermal spring in the Austrian Central Alps and evidence of ammonia-oxidizing crenarchaeota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:259-270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES