Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 28;77(7):2537–2540. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02464-10

TABLE 1.

Biofilter performancea

Train Period No. of samples Δ0-1TOTNH3 (mg N/liter)b % Removal (mean ± standard deviation)c
TCM BDCM DBCM TBM
A I 6 2.7 ± 0.29 9.7 ± 6.4 12 ± 5.3
II 3 3.4 ± 0.26 24 ± 2.3
III 4 3.1 ± 0.38 16 ± 7.6 18 ± 6.5 19 ± 6.3 16 ± 6.2
B I 7 2.1 ± 0.36 7.7 ± 5.2 13 ± 8.3
II 3 3.0 ± 0.23 14 ± 2.0
III 4 2.5 ± 0.37 13 ± 6.2 14 ± 6.0 15 ± 5.2 13 ± 3.8
C I 6 2.6 ± 0.74 6.9 ± 6.0 12 ± 5.0
II 2 2.5 ± 0.62 17 ± 2.0
III 4 2.8 ± 0.67 14 ± 5.7 21 ± 8.1 23 ± 6.0 18 ± 3.8
D I 7 2.0 ± 0.56 6.5 ± 6.5 13 ± 7.3
II 3 1.7 ± 0.22 10 ± 3.2
III 4 2.4 ± 1.1 16 ± 6.9 16 ± 7.6 17 ± 8.1 15 ± 7.6
a

Trains were nominally fed 4 mg N/liter TOTNH3 (sum of ammonia-nitrogen [NH3-N] and ammonium-nitrogen [NH4+-N]). The three operational periods were based on influent THM concentrations as follows: period I, TCM-DBCM (50 μg/liter TCM and 25 μg/liter DBCM); period II, DBCM (25 μg/liter DBCM); and period III, all THMs (15 μg/liter each of TCM, BDCM, DBCM, and TBM).

b

Δ0-1TOTNH3, TOTNH3 removed through biofilter (mean ± standard deviation).

c

TCM, trichloromethane; BDCM, bromodichloromethane; DBCM, dibromochloromethane; TBM, tribromomethane.