Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 30;16(2):151–165. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9250-7

Table 3.

Percentages of statements in verbal protocols for experienced raters (Exp) and non-experienced raters (Non-Exp)

Variable Overall (VP1 + VP2 + VP3 + VP4) VP1 VP2 VP3 VP4
Exp Non-Exp Exp Non-Exp Exp Non-Exp Exp Non-Exp Exp Non-Exp
Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR) Mdn (IQR)
Descriptives 19.8 (13.2) 25.3 (11.0)a 19.8 (20.1) 26.1 (12.8) 10.8 (18.2) 10.7 (18,6) 16.9 (16.3) 29.4 (13.3)a 18.2 (16.5) 20.4 (10.6)
Inferences 19.0 (7.9) 14.7 (5.1)a 38.9 (22.9) 37.5 (21.2) 14.8 (25.6) 20.0 (25,1) 14.5 (9.8) 6.8 (9.2)a 13.5 (14.0) 5.6 (4.6)a
Evaluations 24.4 (10.4) 24.9 (4.7) 7.6 (16.0) 5.4 (10.1) 33.3 (15.1) 18.2 (20,0)a 24.9 (16.3) 25.9 (12.6) 35.9 (17.3) 41.3 (17.3)
Contextual cues 12.9 (7.7) 10.4 (7.3) 13.2 (7.7) 6.1 (14.6)a 8.1 (13.5) .0 (13.7) 18.3 (15.0) 9.8 (11.1) 10.0 (9.1) 8.8 (8.6)
Self-monitoring 20.4 (8.8) 20.5 (10.7) 15.2 (10.8) 16.7 (10.6) 27.9 (22.7) 40.4 (35.9) 20.2 (13.2) 19.4 (10.4) 17.2 (14.6) 13.5 (13.4)

Presented are the median en inter-quartile range (in parentheses)

VP1 verbal protocol at T1, initial representation of student behavior; VP2 verbal protocol at T1, while filling out the one-dimensional rating scale (overall judgment); VP3 verbal protocol at T2, after viewing entire DVD, overall judgment of student performance while filling out one-dimensional rating scale; VP4 verbal protocol while filling out 6-dimensional rating scale

aIndicates significant differences between experienced and non-experienced raters [Mann–Whitney U test, p < .05]