Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 22;104(7):1196–1201. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.49

Table 1. Prospective cohort studies of red and processed meat consumption and ovarian cancer.

Study and location (follow-up) Cases (cohort size) Assessment of diet Measure of exposure and range of exposure RR (95% CI) P for trend Covariates Quality (0–9) a
Incidence
Kushi et al, 1999  United States (1986–1995) 139 (29 083 postmenopausal women) Baseline FFQ Meats: 9–12 servings per week vs <9 servings per week 13–17 servings per week vs <9 servings per week >17 servings per week vs <9 servings per week 1.18 (0.72–1.93)b 0.68 (0.37–1.24)b 1.60 (0.89–2.86)b 0.38 Age, energy intake, number of live births, age at menopause, family history of ovarian cancer, hysterectomy/unilateral oophorectomy, waist-to-hip ratio, physical activity, smoking, education 6
Bertone et al, 2002 United States (1980–1996) 301 (80 258) FFQs, 1980, 1984, 1986, 1990 Hamburger: 1–3 servings per month vs <1 serving per month ⩾1 serving per week vs <1 serving per month Main dish of beef, pork, lamb: 1 serving per week vs <3 servings per month ⩾2 servings per week vs <3 servings per month 1.09 (0.83–1.44) 0.86 (0.63–1.17) 1.17 (0.91–1.51) 1.30 (0.93–1.82) 0.07 0.16 Age, parity, energy intake, age at menarche, menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use, tubal ligation, smoking 5
Larsson and Wolk, 2005 Sweden (1987–2004) 288 (61 057) FFQs, 1987, 1997 Red meat: 2 to <3 servings per week vs <2 servings per week 3 to <4 servings per week vs <2 servings per week ⩾4 servings per week vs <2 servings per week Sausage: ⩾0.5 to <2 servings per week vs <0.5 servings per week ⩾2 servings per week vs <0.5 servings per week 0.86 (0.62–1.21) 1.31 (0.94–1.82) 1.01 (0.70–1.46)b 1.09 (0.87–1.36)b 1.37 (0.83–2.24)b 0.27 Age, BMI, education, parity, use of oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormones, energy intake, fruits, vegetables and dairy products 8
Kiani et al, 2006 United States, The Adventist Health Study (1976–1992) 71 (13 281) Baseline FFQ Beef: >0 to <1 servings per week vs never ⩾1 servings per week vs never 1.23 (0.67–2.25) 1.09 (0.50–2.38) 0.94 Age, parity, BMI, age at menopause, hormone replacement therapy 6
Cross et al, 2007 United States (1995–2003) 552 (119 312) Baseline FFQ Red meat: 21.4 g per 1000 kcal vs 9.8 g per 1000 kcal 31.4 g per 1000 kcal vs 9.8 g per 1000 kcal 42.9 g per 1000 kcal vs 9.8 g per 1000 kcal 62.7 g per 1000 kcal vs 9.8 g per 1000 kcal Processed meat: 4.4 g per 1000 kcal vs 1.6 g per 1000 kcal 7.6 g per 1000 kcal vs 1.6 g per 1000 kcal 12.3 g per 1000 kcal vs 1.6 g per 1000 kcal 22.6 g per 1000 kcal vs 1.6 g per 1000 kcal 1.20 (0.92–1.56) 0.97 (0.73–1.28) 1.09 (0.82–1.45) 1.19 (0.89–1.59) 1.14 (0.87–1.50) 1.21 (0.91–1.59) 1.13 (0.85–1.51) 1.23 (0.92–1.63) 0.33 0.30 Age, sex, education, marital status, BMI, family history of cancer, race, smoking, physical activity, energy intake, alcohol, fruit and vegetable consumption 6
Schulz et al, 2007 Europe (1992–2004) 581 (325 731) Baseline FFQ Red meat: 25 to <35 g per day vs <25 g per day 35 to <44 g per day vs <25 g per day 44 to <55 vs <25 g per day ⩾55 g per day vs <25 g per day Processed meat: 17 to <26 g per day vs <17 g per day 26 to <33 g per day vs <17 g per day 33 to <42 g per day vs <17 g per day ⩾42 g per day vs <17 g per day 1.22 (0.87–1.69) 1.13 (0.79–1.61) 1.13 (0.78–1.63) 1.04 (0.70–1.56) 0.98 (0.69–1.37) 1.10 (0.76–1.59) 1.09 (0.74–1.62) 1.25 (0.81–1.91) 0.89 0.23 BMI, parity, menopausal status, use of oral contraceptives, energy intake, education, smoking, unilateral ovariectomy, hormone replacement therapy 6
Gilsing et al, 2011 The Netherlands (1986–2002) 340 (62 573 postmenopausal women, including 2161 subcohort members for case–cohort analysis) Baseline FFQ Fresh red meat: 61.3 g per day vs 36.2 g per day 77.9 g per day vs 36.2 g per day 95.6 g per day vs 36.2 g per day 129.6 g per day vs 36.2 g per day Processed meat: 2.7 g per day vs 0 g per day 6.8 g per day vs 0 g per day 13.0 g per day vs 0 g per day 25.6 g per day vs 0 g per day 1.58 (1.08–2.30)b 1.47 (1.00–2.16)b 1.78 (1.23–2.58)b 0.93 (0.61–1.42)b 0.71 (0.49–1.03)b 0.91 (0.64–1.29)b 0.93 (0.65–1.31)b 0.83 (0.59–1.20)b 0.85 0.74 Age, energy intake, parity, use of oral contraceptives 6
               
Mortality
Sakauchi et al, 2007 Japan (1988–2003) 77 (63 541) Baseline FFQ Pork: 1–2 times per week vs ⩽1–2 times per month ⩾3–4 times per week vs ⩽1–2 times per month Beef: 1–2 times per month vs seldom ⩾1–2 times per week vs seldom Ham and sausage: 1–2 times per week vs ⩽1–2 times per month ⩾3–4 times per week vs ⩽1–2 times per month 1.26 (0.55–2.88)b 1.59 (0.62–4.08)b 1.06 (0.41–2.75)b 1.24 (0.50–3.05)b 0.73 (0.31–1.73)b 0.91 (0.30–2.76)b 0.34 0.63 0.68 Age, menopausal status, number of pregnancies, sex hormone use (oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy), BMI, physical activity, education 6

Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; CI=confidence interval; FFQ=food-frequency questionnaire; RR=relative risk.

a

Evaluated according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (Wells et al, 2011).

b

Highest adjusted.