Firing properties of interneurons are altered by genetically
manipulated overexpression of GluR-B. (a) Spontaneous
EPSP rise time and decay time plots for stratum pyramidale fast-spiking
interneurons, recorded from a membrane potential of −70 mV. Data are
shown as cumulative probability for >4,000 EPSPs from five cells from
five wild-type and five cells from five mutant mice. Model data show
change in unitary EPSC for parameters that best fit the experimental
data: “wild-type” unitary EPSC = t exp
(−t/0.95) nS, “mutant” unitary EPSC =
t exp(−t/1.05) nS. (Scale bars: 0.8
nS, 1 ms.) (b) Firing pattern in response to a single
proximal stratum radiatum stimulation. Traces show response (from −70
mV) to increasing stimulus intensity (5–20 V) for interneurons from
wild-type and mutant. Note increasing intensities generate double
spikes in the cell from the mutant. (Scale bars: 50 mV, 40 ms.) Model
data show voltage responses for single interneurons (holding current
−0.165 nA) receiving identical EPSC onto single compartments on each
of three dendrites. Each EPSC had the time course ct
exp(−t/τ), where τ = 0.95 for control and
1.05 for mutant; c = 16.1, 47.4, 83.8 nS (top to
bottom). Note the spike doublet in the mutant, but not in the wild type
(as in experiment). (Scale bars: 50 mV, 30 ms.) (c)
Pattern of pyramidal cell phasic inhibitory input (upper traces) and
interneuron phasic excitatory input (lower traces) during posttetanic
oscillations, in wild-type and in mutant mice. The interneuron was
hyperpolarized by injection of −0.2 nA current. [Scale bars
(experiment): 2 mV, 100 ms.] Model data show GABAA
conductance to an e-cell (upper traces) and AMPA conductance to an
i-cell. Note, in the “mutant,” the more variable amplitude of
GABAA inputs, and the variable width of the AMPA inputs.
[Scale bars (model): 150 nS, 100 ms.] (d) Example
traces of interneuron firing patterns during gamma-frequency
oscillations following paired tetanic stimulation, illustrating the
increased incidence of doublet formation and the occurrence of
occasional spike bursts. Model data show voltage of a selected
interneuron from network simulations in the wild type and the mutant.
The only difference in parameters for these simulations was in
interneuron EPSC time course illustrated in a. [Scale
bars (experiment and model): 20 mV, 100 ms.] Below are histograms
illustrating the probability of a doublet of interval x
relative to the sample mode. There are 45 doublets from wild-type data
(n = three cells from three animals) and 130
doublets from mutant data (n = five cells from five
animals). Model histograms were constructed by using ≈110 doublet
intervals for simulations of “wild type” and “mutant” gamma
oscillations, each pooled from seven interneurons.