Table 3.
Layout | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Akt1 | Akt2 | Angpt1 | Apaf1 | Atm | Bad | Bax | Bcl2 | Bcl2l1 | Birc5 | Brca1 | Casp8 |
−1.16 | −1.42 | −1.01 | 1.02 | −1.09 | 1.17 | −1.08 | 1.14 | 1.20 | 1.27 | 1.12 | 1.32 | |
B | Ccnd1 | Ccne1 | Cdc25a | Cdh1 | Cdk2 | Cdk4 | Cdkn1a | Cdkn2a | Cflar | Chek2 | Col18a1 | Ctnnb1 |
1.00 | 4.19 | 1.15 | 1.03 | −1.68 | 1.38 | 1.75 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 2.8 | 1.28 | −1.27 | |
C | E2f1 | Egfr | Ets2 | Fas | Fgf1 | Fgfr2 | Figf | Fos | Grb2 | Hgf | Ifnb1 | Igf1 |
1.35 | −1.13 | −1.01 | 1.22 | −1.26 | −1.31 | −1.29 | −1.64 | 1.09 | 1.10 | −1.20 | −1.50 | |
D | Itga2 | Itga3 | Itga4 | Itgav | Itgb1 | Itgb3 | Jun | Kiss1 | Map2k1 | Mcam | Mdm2 | Met |
1.27 | 1.10 | 1.43 | 1.20 | −1.08 | 1.05 | −1.61 | −1.28 | 1.08 | 1.29 | −1.12 | −1.22 | |
E | Mmp2 | Mmp9 | Mta1 | Mta2 | Muc1 | Myc | Ncam1 | Nfkb1 | Nfkbia | Nme4 | Pdgfa | Pdgfb |
1.52 | −1.15 | −1.18 | 1.15 | −1.37 | 2.78 | −1.04 | 1.07 | −1.17 | −1.31 | −1.04 | 1.09 | |
F | Pik3r1 | Plau | Plaur | Pten | Raf1 | Rb1 | S100a4 | Serpinb2 | Serpine1 | Syk | Tek | Tert |
1.30 | 1.52 | 1.38 | −1.07 | −1.17 | 1.03 | 1.30 | −1.20 | −1.19 | 1.42 | 1.12 | −1.66 | |
G | Tgfb1 | Tgfbr1 | Thbs1 | Timp1 | Tnf | Tnfrsf10b | Tnfrsf1a | Trp53 | Twist1 | Vegfa | Vegfb | Vegfc |
1.38 | −1.06 | 2.37 | −1.20 | −1.45 | 2.07 | 1.05 | −1.03 | −1.03 | 1.03 | 1.48 | 1.36 |
Gene expression between Tg and WT mice at 25 weeks after DEN treatment was compared using RT2 Profiler version 3.2, a Web-based software package for the Profiler PCR array system (SABiosciences-Qiagen, Frederick, MD; http://www.sabiosciences.com/pcr/arrayanalysis.php); this software automatically performs all ΔΔCT-based fold-change calculations from the specific uploaded raw threshold cycle data.