Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Lipidol. 2011 Mar–Apr;5(2):105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.02.001

Table 2.

Associations of LDL Cholesterol and LDL Particle Number with Incident CVD in Participants with Concordant or Discordant Levels

Model 1 Model 2
Mean Levels (SD) LDL-C LDL-P LDL-C LDL-P
Subgroup n CVD
Events
LDL-C LDL-P HR
(95% CI)
p HR
(95% CI)
p HR
(95% CI)
p HR
(95% CI)
p
Overall 5598 319 117
(31)
1249
(333)
1.20
(1.08, 1.34)
0.0009 1.32
(1.19, 1.47)
<0.0001 1.28
(1.15, 1.43)
<0.0001 1.35
(1.21, 1.50)
<0.0001
Concordant 2775 160 117
(37)
1252
(395)
1.27
(1.12, 1.44)
0.0003 1.27
(1.12, 1.44)
0.0002 1.32
(1.16, 1.50)
<0.0001 1.30
(1.14, 1.48)
<0.0001
Discordant* 2823 159 117
(25)
1246
(259)
1.07
(0.88, 1.30)
0.52 1.45
(1.19, 1.78)
0.0003 1.17
(0.96, 1.42)
0.13 1.41
(1.15, 1.75)
0.001

Estimates reported are from multivariable Cox regression analyses. Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender and race. Model 2 was adjusted additionally for systolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, smoking, body mass index, and diabetes status. Hazards ratios (95% confidence intervals) are for a 1-SD increment of LDL-P or LDL-C, using the SD values in the overall population of 333 nmol/L and 31.4 mg/dL, respectively.

*

This subgroup comprises the combined LDL-P > LDL-C and LDL-P < LDL-C discordant subgroups in Table 1.

Abbreviations: LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; LDL-P, LDL particle number.