Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Learn Disabil. 2010 Apr 7;43(5):402–417. doi: 10.1177/0022219409355475

Table 3.

Descriptive Statistics for Progress Monitoring Measures

Time
1 2 3 4 5

Variable M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) ES
Letter Sound Fluency 0.431
 Intervention 18.57 (10.52) 33.08 (13.45) 40.75 (16.03) 47.09 (11.63)
 Control 17.67 (13.69) 28.43 (14.28) 30.75 (16.46) 38.66 (19.45)
Decodable Word Fluency 1.47a
 Intervention 3.27 (1.90) 9.53 (8.07) 12.53 (5.87) 14.60 (7.52)
 Control 3.57 (2.39) 6.17 (4.30) 9.30 (5.40) 8.67 (4.02)
Word Identification Fluency 0.457
 Intervention 2.40 (0.095) 8.93 (9.84) 6.97 (3.17) 9.33 (2.93)
 Control 2.67 (1.03) 6.07 (2.75) 6.37 (3.22) 7.73 (3.50)
Spelling–Words 0.788a
 Intervention 2.87 (2.29) 6.13 (2.92) 6.73 (3.75) 8.33 (3.29)
 Control 2.93 (2.28) 5.73 (3.31) 5.47 (2.59) 6.33 (2.50)
Spelling–CLS 0.612
 Intervention 23.93 (8.92) 34.73 (9.28) 35.67 (11.09) 39.80 (9.87)
 Control 23.60 (10.84) 32.47 (10.61) 32.73 (8.27) 35.33 (7.30)
Math–Correct Digits 0
 Intervention 2.13 (2.36) 9.40 (3.44) 7.00 (2.90)
 Control 3.07 (2.79) 9.27 (3.45) 7.00 (3.44)

CLS = correct letter sequence; ES = effect size calculated at Time 5 (posttest).

a

Variables were involved in significant interactions and effect sizes are presented for comparison to other studies.