Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hepatol. 2010 Mar 4;52(5):727–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.030

Table 1.

Animal characteristics.

Age LETO OLETF
Body weight (g) Food consumption (g/wk) Fat pad mass (g) Body weight (g) Food consumption (g/wk) Fat pad mass (g)
5 wk 107.6 ± 6.0a 65.2 ± 2.8a 0.3 ± 0.03a 132.4 ± 5.1a* 88.5 ± 6.5a* 0.4 ± 0.04a
8 wk 228.4 ± 6.3b 135.4 ± 5.3b 0.9 ± 0.08b 288.5 ± 5.0b* 182.9 ± 2.8b* 3.5 ± 0.19b*
13 wk 380.8 ± 5.9c 155.3 ± 1.4c 4.9 ± 0.3c 495.4 ± 15.8c* 222.5 ± 4.8c* 15.7 ± 1.6c*
20 wk 477.9 ± 6.6d 164.0 ± 2.1d 8.9 ± 0.6d 607.0 ± 10.5d* 241.8 ± 7.0c* 25.8 ± 1.0d*
40 wk 557.4 ± 15.0e 166.5 ± 4.6d 14.6 ± 1.2e 685.2 ± 34.6e* 308.5 ± 18.6d* 55.7 ± 7.5e*

Values are means ± SE (n = 6–8). Different letter superscripts within an animal group indicate a significant change between ages (p <0.05). Significant age-associated increases were noted in both animals groups for body weight, absolute food consumption, and fat pad mass (omental and retroperitoneal fat pads).

*

Indicates values at the respective age are significantly different in OLETF compared with LETO rats (p <0.01).