Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neural Netw. 2010 Dec 1;24(6):515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.11.007

Fig. 6. Comparison of spatiotemporal patterns in ECoG data and in cellular automaton model data.

Fig. 6

The left shows successive frames of activity, every 2 ms, from an 8 × 6 subdural array of electrodes (with 1 cm spacing), in Patient B of Roopun et al. (2009). The right shows frames of activity every 1.25 ms, from a cellular automaton model with 480,000 “cells” in an 800 × 600 array, with sparse, localized gap junctional connectivity (mean index <i> = 1.33, connectivity footprint = 25 lattice spacings), and rare spontaneous action potentials. From Traub et al. (2010).