Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec 31;3(2):172–178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.848432

Table 2.

Comparison of HLHS conditions (RA vs. MH)

HLHS condition(n=43)
 P-value*
RA MH
MCA PI 1.59 ± 0.36 1.67 ± 0.29 0.059
PA 1 PI 3.2 ± 0.59 2.85 ± 0.43 <0.001*
PA 2 PI 3.53 ± 0.59 3.1 ± 0.48 <0.001*
PA 3 PI 4.1 ± 0.68 3.35 ± 0.52 <0.001*
RVCO (cc/kg/min) 414.6 ± 96.2 419.4 ± 103.7 0.625

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

*

P-value has been calculated using Paired t-test