Table 5.
HLHS-RA (R/IAS) vs. HLHS-MH (R/IAS)
| HLHS condition(n=9) |
P-value* | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RA | MH | ||
| UA PI | 1.15 ± 0.24 | 1.21 ± 0.23 | 0.447 |
| MCA PI | 1.53 ± 0.30 | 1.64 ± 0.22 | 0.110 |
| DA PI | 2.80 ± 0.31 | 3.03 ± 0.24 | 0.209 |
| PA 1 PI | 3.1 ± 0.49 | 2.95 ± 0.36 | 0.498 |
| PA 2 PI | 3.25 ± 0.48 | 3.39 ± 0.57 | 0.615 |
| PA 3 PI | 4.18 ± 0.68 | 3.67 ± 0.70 | 0.101 |
| RVCO (cc/kg/min) | 439.1 ± 122.5 | 439.6 ± 149.5 | 0.980 |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
*
P-value has been calculated using Paired t-test and significance level has been identified based on Bonferroni correction (α/2=0.05/2=0.025).