Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Nat Prod. 2011 Jan 11;74(3):341–351. doi: 10.1021/np100721g

Table 4.

Bioassay Data for Compounds in this Study.

cmpd. NSC # GI50 (μM) Cell-based microfilament assayb


HCT-116a MDA-MB-231a 0.01 μM 0.05 μM 0.1 μM 0.5 μM 1.0 μM 5.0 μM
1 613009 0.04 0.01 - - - +++ +++ +++
3 731258 0.14c 0.04 - + + ++ ++ ++
4 751841 0.02 0.02 NT
5 751842 0.11 0.26 NT
6 751843 0.13 0.21 NT
7 751844 0.05 0.07 NT
8 751837 0.06 0.09 - - - +++ +++ +++
9 666654 13.7c 2.50 - - - - - -
10 d 0.27c NT - - - + ++ ++
11 751840 0.28c 0.74 - - - + ++ ++
12 751838 11.1 22.3 - - - - - -
13 751839 0.07 0.09 - + ++ +++ +++ +++
14 662466 3.84 2.32 - - - - - -
15 752380 NAe NA - - - - - -
a

GI50 data provided by the National Cancer Institute-Developmental Therapeutics Program (NCI-DTP). For the comprehensive data set against 60 cell lines use the NSCs above at http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/.

b

The microfilament-disrupting effects were evaluated based on image analysis of the actin cytoskeleton in fixed HCT-116 cells: (+) Loss of microfilament; (++) Additional loss of microfilament; (+++) Total loss of microfilament network; (-) inactive.

c

IC50 determined by the Valeriote group at Henry Ford Hospital.

d

10 was not selected for testing by the NCI-DTP.

e

15 displayed < 25% growth inhibition at 10 μM and was not selected for five-dose testing. NT=not tested, NA=not active.