Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb 1;3(3):183–191. doi: 10.1186/bcr293

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors related to axillary lymph node invasion

Factor Variable No. of women Positive nodes (%) Odds ratio 95% CI P
Histology Ductal 45 29 (64%) 1.00
Other 7 6 (86%) 3.31 0.37-29.97 0.287
Tumor mass Single 36 21 (58%) 1.00
Other 16 14 (88%) 5.00 0.99-25.34 0.052
Clinical response No 13 (77%) 1.00
Yes 39 25 (64%) 0.54 0.13-2.28 0.398
ER Negative 22 16 (73%) 1.00
Positive 30 19 (63%) 0.65 0.20-2.14 0.477
PR Negative 28 21 (75%) 1.00
Positive 24 14 (58%) 0.47 0.14-1.52 0.205
c-erb-B2 Negative 37 24 (64%) 1.00
Positive 15 11 (73%) 1.49 0.37-5.62 0.557
53 Negative 34 24 (71%) 1.00
Positive 18 11 (61%) 0.65 0.20-2.18 0.489
Ki67 <20% 17 6 (35%) 1.00
≥ 20% 33 27 (82%) 8.25 2.18-31.23 0.002
MDR1 (IHC) Negative 14 8 (57%) 1.00
Positive 9 7 (78%) 2.63 0.39-17.46 0.318
LRP Negative 8 3 (38%) 1.00
Positive 23 17 (74%) 4.72 0.86-26.04 0.075
MDR1 (RT-PCR) Negative 24 13 (54%) 1.00
Positive 22 18 (82%) 3.81 0.99-14.67 0.052
MDR1 (RT-PCR) Both negative 8 3 (38%) 1.00
and LRP combined
LRP+ MDR1- 7 4 (57%) 2.22 0.28-17.63 0.450
Both positive 15 13 (87%) 10.83 1.37-85.43 0.024

CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; RT-PCR, reverse-transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction.