Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 15;11:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-70

Table 2.

Effects of reduced taxon and site sampling

Supports for Great Ape parasites sister-group of:

Number of Taxa Genes Rodent Primate+Rodent Primate
PP, SH, BS PP, SH, BS PP, SH, BS
CytB 0.221, *, 0.306 0.612, 0.29, 0.444 0.166, *, 0.250
8 Taxa Cox1 0.152, *, 0.374 0.848, 0.45, 0.610 0.000, *, 0.016
Cox3 0.922, 0.63, 0.659 0.002, *, 0.013 0.070, *, 0.313
Conc. 0.971, 0.58, 0.655 0.029, *, 0.316 0.000, *, 0.029

CytB 0.911, 0.77, 0.548 0.074, *, 0.225 0.013, *, 0.009
33 Taxa Cox1 0.022, *, 0.336 0.976, 0.61, 0.606 0.001, *, 0.043
Cox3 0.985, 0.90, 0.801 0.003, *, 0.011 0.012, *, 0.092
Conc. 0.999, 0.93, 0.821 0.001, *, 0.174 0.000, *, 0.004

Dependency of clade support on a reduced (8 Taxa) or extended (33 Taxa) taxon sampling, and on individual (CytB, Cox1 and Cox3 genes) or concatenated (Conc.) gene analyses. Models GTRnt + Γ4 + I and GTRnt + Γ4 were applied to nucleotide alignments, under maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (BI) methods, respectively. Cells display support as [PP, SH, BS] with PP: posterior probability (BI), SH: Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like support (ML), and BS: bootstrap support (ML). "*": not applicable. Main lineages of mammalian parasites are defined according to their host preference: "Rodent", "Primate" and "Great Ape" (see Additional file 1, Table 1).