Table 5.
Point-biserial correlation coefficients for each listener across each of the six channels. The listener’s performance was correlated on a trial-by-trial basis with the signal-to-noise ratio in each channel for that trial. All correlations were significantly different from zero (p < 0.05). Overall percent-correct scores across all trials are also listed for each listener (second column).
| Listener | Average (%) | E1 | E2 | E3 | TFS1 | TFS2 | TFS3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2_01 | 62 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| 2_02 | 59 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.07 |
| 2_03 | 69 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| 2_04 | 63 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| 2_05 | 60 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| 2_06 | 44 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
| 2_07 | 79 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.05 |
| 2_08 | 66 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| 2_09 | 60 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| 2_10 | 65 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| Mean | 63 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.07 |