Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 5;5(4):e1012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001012

Table 5. Computed free energies of binding and average nucleophilic sulphur-Scissile carbon distancesa.

Ligand: AAALR*NAA BAAPR*NAA CAGPR*NAA DPAGP*AGP EPLGP*AGP FPPGP*PGP
FhCL1 ΔGΔd −10.83 (1.18)3.96 (0.24) −9.10 (1.30)4.00 (0.25) −8.30 (0.96)4.41 (0.30)
FhCL2 ΔGΔd −11.77 (0.75)3.97 (0.24) −6.30 (1.19)3.95 (0.24) −10.88 (0.96)3.94 (0.23) −10.83 (1.30)4.27 (0.34) −4.11 (1.02)4.82 (0.51) b> 10
FhCL3 ΔGΔd −10.40 (0.84)3.99 (0.26) −8.28 (0.82)4.06 (0.25) −12.71 (0.95)4.05 (0.25) −> 10 −9.56 (1.20)4.40 (0.28) b4.08 (0.5)
a

Amino acid sequences of peptide ligands A–F are shown in single letter code with P2 in red and the position of the scissile bond shown by an asterisk; Hyp is indicated by P in ligand F. FhCL1 variants are shown in the leftmost column and are denoted as in Table 4. Mean energies (ΔG) are in kcal/mol, with corresponding standard error of the mean in parentheses. The average distances between the sulphur atom of the catalytic Cys and the backbone carbonyl carbon of scissile ligand residue 4 (Δd) are in Ångstrom, with corresponding standard deviations in parentheses. All measures calculated over the final 4.005 ns of the simulation. Standard errors of the mean for all Δd measures are <0.01 Å;

b

Not calculated, see Methods.