Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 5;183(6):E337–E343. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101506

Table 1:

Manufacturer involvement in and funding of cost-effectiveness analysis studies involving the Pap test for cervical cancer screening or prevention

Manufacturer involvement and funding No. (%)
All studies n = 109 Studies with estimates of Pap test sensitivity and specificity n = 88 Noneligible studies n = 21
Author affiliated with manufacturer
 Yes 19 (17.4) 19 (21.6) 0 (0.0)
 No 90 (82.6) 69 (78.4) 21 (100.0)
Funding from the manufacturer
 Yes 25 (22.9) 25 (28.4) 0 (0.0)
 No 84 (77.1) 63 (71.6) 21 (100.0)
Conflict of interest related to manufacturer
 Yes 34 (31.2) 32 (36.4) 2 (9.5)
 No 58 (53.2) 45 (51.1) 13 (61.9)
 Not reported 17 (15.6) 11 (12.5) 6 (28.6)
Author affiliation with, funding from or conflict of interest related to manufacturer*
 Yes 41 (44.6) 39 (49.4) 2 (15.4)
 No 51 (55.4) 40 (50.6) 11 (84.6)
Other (nonmanufacturer) funding reported
 Yes 50 (45.9) 41 (46.6) 9 (42.9)
 No 59 (54.1) 47 (53.4) 12 (57.1)
*

Studies were excluded if they did not contain a conflict of interest statement, declared no conflict of interest, did not have an author affiliated with the manufacturer, and did not receive funding from the manufacturer.