Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 19;25(5):1617–1623. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1450-y

Table 1.

Comparison of demographics, surgical indications, extent of resection, size of the dominant nodule, weight of gland, and final pathology between endoscopic thyroidectomy and robotically assisted thyroidectomy

Variable Endoscopic thyroidectomy (n = 39) n (%) Robotically assisted thyroidectomy (n = 7) n (%) p value
Median age at presentation: years (range) 44.4 (20.3–58.3) 43.4 (20.2–54.7) 0.689
Gender 1.000
 Female 38 (97.4) 7 (100.0)
 Male 1 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
Surgical indications 0.139
 Pressure symptoms 7 (17.9) 1 (14.3)
 Patient preference 13 (33.3) 2 (28.6)
 Indeterminate FNAC 19 (48.7) 3 (42.9)
 Malignancy 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3)
Size of largest nodule on ultrasound: cm (range) 2.5 (0.8–3.5) 1.6 (0.5–3.0) 0.244
Extent of resection 0.176
 Unilateral thyroid resection 29 (77.0) 3 (33.3)
 Bilateral thyroid resection 10 (23.1) 4 (66.7)
Final pathology 0.493
 Nodular hyperplasia 29 (74.4) 6 (85.7)
 Follicular adenoma 5 (12.8) 0 (0.0)
 Grave’s disease 1 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
 Differentiated thyroid carcinoma 4 (10.3) 1 (14.3)

FNAC fine-needle aspiration cytology