Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Apr;33(4):792–802. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22507

Table 2.

Reproducibility of technique, measured by acquiring data from 3 healthy volunteers.

volunteer 1 volunteer 2 volunteer 3
1 2 1 2 1 2
VS, cm3 224 324 324 288 324 324
VA, cm3 404 515 403 500 505 570
Voverlap, cm3 427 327 502
Cho/Cre (S) 1.009 1.044 1.198 1.177 1.286 1.290
Cho/Cre (A) 1.067 1.09 1.211 1.162 1.287 1.291
NAA/Cre (S) 1.985 2.093 2.103 2.078 2.196 2.139
NAA/Cre (A) 2.163 2.168 2.138 2.131 2.275 2.293

Each volunteer received two exams, prescribed by two different operators. Each exam contained STANDARD (S) and AUTOSAT+OCTAGONAL (A) MRSI acquisitions. Covered volumes (VS, VA) were defined as the volumes within the PRESS box, not covered by sat bands. Voverlap was calculated as intersection between the volumes, covered by AUTOSAT+OCTAGONAL acquisitions. Mean metabolite ratios were calculated within volumes, covered by all four acquisitions of the same subject.