Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 5;6(4):e18600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018600

Table 1. Percentages of nuclei in hypodiploid, diploid, hyperdiploid, tetraploid and hypertetraploid classes based on DNA content.

Chrysotile concentration Recoveryperiod hypodiploid% (n) diploid% (n) hyperdiploid% (n) tetraploid% (n) hypertetraploid% (n)
Control cells 3.83 (46) 58.92 (707) 20.17 (242) 16.83 (202) 0.25 (3)
250 µg/ml 2 days 8.83 (106) 28.75 (345) 29.08 (349) 26.27 (320) 7.4 (89)
4 days 5.83 (70) 31.67 (380) 27.58 (331) 26.17 (314) 9.17 (110)
8 days 5.92 (71) 31.08 (373) 29.83 (358) 22.58 (271) 10.58 (127)
125 µg/ml 2 days 5.50 (66) 35.08 (421) 32.17 (386) 22.75 (273) 4.5 (54)
4 days 5.50 (66) 43.0 (516) 20.92 (251) 26.17 (314) 4.42 (53)
8 days 4.50 (54) 53.42 (641) 16.42 (197) 20.08 (241) 5.58 (67)
62.5 µg/ml 2 days 8.0 (96) 44.5 (534) 26.42 (317) 17.58 (211) 3.5 (42)
4 days 7.67 (92) 45.75 (549) 19.33 (232) 23.83 (286) 3.42 (41)
8 days 4.50 (54) 51.17 (614) 15.42 (185) 24.25 (291) 4.67 (56)

Nuclear DNA content of control and chrysotile (250 µg/ml, 125 µg/ml or 62.5 µg/ml) -treated HK2 cells (for 48 h) allowed to recover in fiber-free medium for 2, 4 and 8 days was quantified. The nuclei were then divided into the following 5 classes: hypodiploid (DNA content ≤1.49 C), diploid (DNA content between 1.5 C and 2.39 C), hyperdiploid (DNA content between 2.4 C and 3.59 C), tetraploid (DNA content between 3.6 C and 5.1 C), and hypertetraploid (DNA content >5.1 C). For the control group and each treatment group, 1200 nuclei were analyzed. When compared to control cells, all chrysotile treatments led to hypertetraploid nuclei formation (P<0.001).