Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 10;60(1):169–185. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern273

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Histochemical localization of GUS activity in transgenic tomato plants under control of the AGPL1 and CaMV 35S promoters. Transgenic tomato carrying the AGPL1 promoter fused to GUS (A–E): (A) leaf; (B) root; (C) longitudinal section of stem; (D) transverse section of stem; (E) fruit. Transgenic tomato carrying the CaMV 35S promoter fused to GUS (a–e): (a) leaf; (b) root; (c) longitudinal section of stem; (d) transverse section of stem; (dd) bud; (e) fruit. (E and e) Note that the driving patterns for the AGPL1 promoter and CaMV 35S promoter plants are different. (F) Histochemical staining of 10-d-old transgenic tomato seedlings. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)