Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 6;6(4):e18210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018210

Table 1. Empirical Bayes effect estimates and weights for the 26 epidemiological studies included in meta-analysis.

Study Weight Effect Estimate 95% CI
Chien 26.08 1.15 0.94 1.40
Coogan 2.23 1.15 0.89 1.49
Coogan 18.60 1.11 0.89 1.38
Coogan 19.33 1.03 0.83 1.28
Cotterchio 18.60 1.14 0.91 1.41
Dalton 57.52 1.00 0.96 1.05
Danielson 9.10 0.98 0.77 1.25
Davis 15.27 1.16 0.92 1.45
Dublin 15.66 0.99 0.79 1.24
Fulton Kehoe 50.83 1.05 0.95 1.16
Gonzalez Perez 37.84 1.03 0.88 1.20
Haque 43.40 1.12 0.98 1.28
Harlow & Cramer 5.02 1.17 0.91 1.51
Harlow 19.16 1.25 1.01 1.55
Haukka 25.51 1.27 1.05 1.55
Kato 12.22 1.22 0.96 1.54
Kelly 8.41 1.16 0.91 1.48
Moorman 28.01 1.01 0.83 1.22
Moorman 18.32 1.07 0.86 1.34
Sharpe 16.54 1.31 1.05 1.64
Steingart 33.17 1.16 0.98 1.38
Tamim 33.29 1.23 1.04 1.46
Wallace 2.81 1.13 0.87 1.46
Wang 39.46 1.06 0.92 1.23
Weiss 8.51 1.08 0.85 1.38
Wernli 47.30 0.93 0.83 1.05