Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;66(3):417–420. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000300009

Table 3.

Literature review of reported series of patients requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy.

First author Year No. of patients with attempted converted to LC, n No. of patients OC, n (%) Conversion rate by gender, male/female, % Rate of acute operation in conversion to OC, n (%) Presence of previous Main reason for conversion upper abdominal surgery, n (%)
Pavlidis (14) 2007 1263 98 (7.7) 11.6 / 6.3 20 (20.4) 0 Unclear anatomy due to previous inflammation
Shamiyeh (15) 2007 4505 245 (5.4) 9.1 / 3.9 178 (73) 83 (36) Acute cholecystitis
Georgiades (12) 2008 2184 110 (5) 6.5 / 4.3 51 (46.4) 31 (28) Presence of inflammation
Zhang (9) 2008 1265 94 (7.4) 11.6 / 5.3 39 (42) 22 (23.4) Inability to correctly identify anatomy
Ballal (10)* 2009 39418 2036 (5.2) 9.8 / 3.8 422 (20.7) ND Emergency admission and increased disease severity
Avgerinos (11) 2009 1046 27 (2.6) ND 9 (33.3) 3 (11.1) Hemorrhage in the surgical field
Ghnman (13) 2010 340 17 (5) 46 / 1.6 10 (58.8) ND Unclear anatomy (acute cholecystitis)
Ercan (16) 2010 2015 101 (5) 6.4 / 4.3 ND 23 (22.7) Intra-abdominal and perihepatic adhesions

ND: No data, OC: Open cholecystectomy.

*

Multicenter study.

Defined only as “emergency admission”; no data related to acute operation were included.

Defined only as “with inflammation”; no data related to acute operation were included.

All patients with previous upper abdominal surgery were excluded from laparoscopic procedures.