Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2008 Oct 4;157(4):733–748. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.050

Table 3.

Total numbers of CTb-ir cells sampled in subdivisions of the dorsal raphe nucleus and median raphe nucleus (mean ± SEM) in Experiment 2 (Control, n = 6; Handled, n = 10; Open-field, n = 11).

Rostrocaudal Level Subdivision Control Handled Open-field

-7.46 mm DRD 3.0 ± 0.9 2.2 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.6
-8.00 mm DRD 2.5 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 0.5
-8.18 mm DRD 5.7 ± 1.8 5.5 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 0.7
-7.46 mm DRV 2.7 ± 1.1 3.1 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 0.4
-8.00 mm DRV 3.3 ± 0.9 7.0 ± 2.9 3.0 ± 0.8
-8.18 mm DRV 5.3 ± 1.8 5.9 ± 1.8 2.3 ± 0.7
-8.00 mm DRVL 4.7 ± 1.0 3.4 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.6
-8.18 mm DRVL 2.7 ± 1.0 1.7 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.2
-8.18 mm DRI 2.0 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.5 0.3 ± 0.2A
-8.54 mm DRI 5.5 ± 1.3 1.8 ± 0.5A 2.1 ± 0.8A
-8.54 mm DRC 1.8 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.3
-8.18 mm MRN 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.2
-8.54 mm MRN 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.2
A

P < 0.05 versus Control; post hoc Bonferroni comparisons