Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 6;27(8):1052–1060. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr106

Table 5.

Binomial probabilities, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses, for TPs detected using alternative analysis, corresponding to three different coverage values

Platform Coverage
Alternative analysis for amplifications
Alternative analysis for deletions
0.1 Mb (lower, upper) 0.5 Mb (lower, upper) 1 Mb (lower, upper) 0.1 Mb (lower, upper) 0.5 Mb (lower, upper) 1 Mb (lower, upper)
Affymetrix 6.0 0.36 (0.24, 0.49) 0.69 (0.56, 0.8) 0.77 (0.64, 0.86) 0.04 (0, 0.21) 1 (0.86, 1) 1 (0.86, 1)
Affymetrix 2.7M 0.25 (0.15, 0.37) 0.44 (0.31, 0.57) 0.45 (0.33, 0.58) 0.54 (0.33, 0.74) 0.96 (0.79, 1) 0.96 (0.79, 1)
Agilent 1M 0.38 (0.26, 0.5) 0.7 (0.58, 0.81) 0.73 (0.61, 0.84) 0.83 (0.63, 0.95) 0.88 (0.68, 0.97) 0.92 (0.73, 0.99)
Illumina 1M Duo 0.44 (0.31, 0.57) 0.7 (0.58, 0.81) 0.75 (0.63, 0.85) 0.21 (0.07, 0.42) 0.92 (0.73, 0.99) 0.96 (0.79, 1)
NimbleGen 2.1M 0.34 (0.23, 0.47) 0.73 (0.61, 0.84) 0.81 (0.7, 0.9) 0.92 (0.73, 0.99) 1 (0.86, 1) 1 (0.86, 1)
NimbleGen 3x720K 0.34 (0.23, 0.47) 0.75 (0.63, 0.85) 0.8 (0.68, 0.89) 1 (0.86, 1) 1 (0.86, 1) 1 (0.86, 1)

Data graphed in Figure 5c and d.