Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2008 Apr;22(2):274–286. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.274

Table 2.

Hierarchical Regression Models Predicting Marital Interactions and Marital Adjustment

Adolescent-era predictors Marital hostility
Marital positive engagement
Marital adjustment
Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Sex (0 = female; 1 = male) −.01 .00 −.04 −.00 − .08 − .05 − .06
Psychiatric hospitalization .43** .32* −.56** −.38** − .30* −.17 −.23
Family hostility .47** −.32** −.22 .05
Family positive engagement .06 .18 .14 .07
Sex X Family hostility −.40*
Sex X Family engagement
Psychiatric hospitalization X Family hostility
Psychiatric hospitalization X Family engagement
Family hostility X Family engagement
Statistics for step
 R2 .19** .38** .32** .46** .10 .17 .25*
 A R2 .19** .14** .07 .08*
F 5.04** 6.38** 10.36** 8.84** 2.35 2.04 2.66*
 (df) (2, 44) (4, 42) (2, 44) (4, 42) (2, 43) (4, 41) (5, 40)

Note. Values presented are standardized regression weights. If no value was entered for a variable in Step 3, its contribution to prediction of the criterion variable was not significant, and it was not included in the final model.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.